13.01.2014 Views

PhD Fekete - SZIE version - 2.2 - Szent István Egyetem

PhD Fekete - SZIE version - 2.2 - Szent István Egyetem

PhD Fekete - SZIE version - 2.2 - Szent István Egyetem

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Materials and Methods<br />

−<br />

−<br />

−<br />

−<br />

The femur distalis was constrained by a GENERAL POINT MOTION, where all the<br />

coordinates can be prescribed (Figure 3.32). Only one prescription was set: the<br />

endpoint of the femur (distalis) can only perform translational motion along the y-axis.<br />

The ankle part of the model was constrained by a SPHERICAL JOINT, which allows<br />

rotation about all axes, but no translational motions are permitted in that point<br />

(Figure 3.32). By applying this constraint, the tibia can perform a natural rotation and a<br />

kinematic analysis can be carried out in a further study.<br />

Between the femur, tibia and patella, CONTACT constraints were set according to<br />

Coulomb’s law with respect to the very low static and dynamic friction coefficients<br />

(µ s = 0.003, µ d = 0.001) similarly to real joints [Mow and Soslowsky, 1991,<br />

Quian et al., 2006] (Figure 3.32). With this constraint, the kinetic relationship between<br />

the normal and friction forces (F n , F s ) and the flexion angle can be analyzed.<br />

The following material properties were set [Guess and Maletsky, 2004]: Young<br />

modulus Femur : 19 GPa, Poisson ratio Femur : 0.3, Young modulus Tibia : 1 GPa, Poisson<br />

ratio Tibia : 0.46. The material properties are necessary if CONTACT is used between the<br />

surfaces (see in CONTACT section).<br />

Figure 3.32. Multibody model in the MSC.ADAMS<br />

– 111 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!