PhD Fekete - SZIE version - 2.2 - Szent István Egyetem
PhD Fekete - SZIE version - 2.2 - Szent István Egyetem
PhD Fekete - SZIE version - 2.2 - Szent István Egyetem
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Literature review<br />
Let us follow the description of Mason et al. [Mason et al., 2008]. Note that l 30 represents the<br />
length of the femur (in their actual calculations they considered it 0.45 m) while l 10 represents<br />
the length of the tibia. The flexion angle is denoted as α. The moment arm is represented as d,<br />
while the body weight vector as BW (Figure 2.38):<br />
d ( α)<br />
= l30 ⋅sin(<br />
α / 2)<br />
(2.4)<br />
M N<br />
( α)<br />
= 0.5⋅<br />
BW ⋅d(<br />
α)<br />
= 0.5⋅<br />
BW ⋅l30 ⋅sin(<br />
α / 2)<br />
(2.5)<br />
The quadriceps tendon force (F q ) can be derived from the net knee moment (M N ) and the<br />
effective moment arm (L eff ) of the quadriceps tendon according to Salem and Powers<br />
[Salem and Powers, 2001]:<br />
Where, L eff can be found in Table <strong>2.2</strong>.<br />
M<br />
k<br />
( α)<br />
F<br />
q<br />
( α)<br />
= (2.6)<br />
L ( α)<br />
eff<br />
Several authors have investigated the ratio of the patellofemoral forces under extension and<br />
flexion exercises, and obtained very similar results [Denham and Bishop, 1987, Van Eijden et<br />
al., 1986, Yamaguchi and Zajac, 1989, Hirokawa, 1991, Miller, 1991, Hefzy and Yang, 1993,<br />
Gill and O’Connor, 1996]. These have been gathered and plotted in Figure 2.39 and<br />
Figure 2.40:<br />
Fpt/Fq [-]<br />
1.2<br />
1<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0<br />
Van Eijden et al.<br />
Bishop and Denham<br />
Yamaguchi and Zajac<br />
Gill and O'Connor<br />
Miller et al.<br />
Hirokawa<br />
Flexion angle [˚]<br />
0 20 40 60 80 100 120<br />
Figure 2.39. F pt/F q relationship<br />
– 43 –