FY14 RDT&E Project Portfolio - USCG - U.S. Coast Guard

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Multiple-Person Recovery Techniques & Equipment Evaluation Mission Need: Multiple person recovery system for time-critical rescues. Project Objectives: • Conduct a trial, evaluative demonstration to determine whether existing technology allows safe, effective, timely multiple-person retrieval/recovery from the water or other hazardous situation, by vessel and aircraft. • Investigate and recommend ways to improve timely and safe person-in-thewater rescue to CG vessels and aircraft. Key Milestone / Deliverable Schedule: Project Start…………………………………………………….. Nov 13 Sponsor/Stakeholder Alignment Sessions……………………. Dec 13 Multiple Person Device Evaluation………………………….. May 14 Preliminary Evaluation Report…………………………… Aug 14 Follow-up Device and Technique Demo/Evaluation………… Nov 14 Technique & Equipment Evaluation Report…….……….. Feb 15 Project End………………………………………..……………. Mar 15 Sponsor: Stakeholder(s): Project #: Tier: RDC POC: CG-926 Domain Lead: 2014-10 3 Mr. M. J. Lewandowski Mr. Jaurin Joseph (860) 271-2692 (202) 475-3493 Expected Benefit: Improve operational performance/efficiency/mission execution/resiliency Notes: CG-SAR CG-711, CG-731, CG-751 Will leverage significant body of prior RDC work. Indicates RDC product. UNCLAS/USCG Research & Development Center 11/6/2013 Version date 17
Alternatives to Pyrotechnic Distress Signals Mission Need: Improve distress signal devices. Project Objectives: • Determine suitability of potential alternatives to pyrotechnic visual distress signals. • Expand knowledge of signal conspicuity and identifiability through additional literature review and analysis of nighttime maritime background environment. • Narrow the optimal distress signal characteristics range by evaluating human-subject response to laboratory generated visual-stimuli. • Validate laboratory findings through human-subject field test. • Recommend optimal visual distress signal characteristics. • Develop “position paper” with recommendations to update carriage requirements to eliminate ineffective devices. Key Milestone / Deliverable Schedule: Project Start …………………………………………………..… Functional Requirements Workshop.………………….….….. Visual Comparisons and Use Testing..…….....………………. 1 Nov 10 30 Feb 11 9 Nov 11 Suitability of Potential Alternatives to Pyrotechnic Distress Signals……………………………………………………….. 31 Jan 12 Laboratory Testing…………………………………………..… Mar 14 Field Testing………………....................................................... Jul 14 Alternatives to Pyrotechnic Distress Signals; Laboratory and Field Studies.............................................................................. Oct 14 Project End ……………………………………………………….. Nov 14 Sponsor: Stakeholder(s): Project #: Tier: RDC POC: CG-926 Domain Lead: 1101 3 Mr. M. J. Lewandowski LCDR Anthony Erickson (860) 271-2692 (202) 475-3748 Expected Benefit: Influence International Standards Notes: CG-ENG CG-SAR, CG-BSX Indicates RDC product. UNCLAS/USCG Research & Development Center 11/6/2013 Version date 18
Page 1 and 2: FY14 RDT&E Project Portfolio UNCLAS
Page 3 and 4: Table of Contents - FY14 CG RDT&E F
Page 5 and 6: Table of Contents - FY14 Externally
Page 7 and 8: FY14 Project Portfolio CG RDT&E Fun
Page 9 and 10: Evaluate Risk Associated with Port/
Page 11 and 12: Port Resilience Operational/Tactica
Page 13 and 14: Analysis in Support of Transition M
Page 15 and 16: Acquisition Support & Analysis (ASA
Page 17: Identify Navigation, Communications
Page 21 and 22: Vertical Take-Off and Landing (VTOL
Page 23 and 24: Robotic Aircraft for Maritime Publi
Page 25 and 26: Monitoring of Water-side Wireless A
Page 27 and 28: Solid State Radar Applications to C
Page 29 and 30: Non-Compliant Vessel (NCV) Video Re
Page 31 and 32: Alternative Precise Network Timing
Page 33 and 34: Alternative Asset Iceberg Reconnais
Page 35 and 36: Support for Joint Technology Demons
Page 37 and 38: C4ISR Branch Support Mission Need:
Page 39 and 40: Investigation of Vessel Biofouling
Page 41 and 42: Next Generation Arctic Navigational
Page 43 and 44: Response to Oil In Ice Mission Need
Page 45 and 46: Improve SMART Protocol Effectivenes
Page 47 and 48: Panga Search Planning Tools/ Probab
Page 49 and 50: CGMOES Next Generation Mission Need
Page 51 and 52: Short Term Modeling & Simulation Su
Page 53 and 54: Tactical Boarding Team Member Neutr
Page 55 and 56: Define and Communicate Exclusion Zo
Page 57 and 58: Cost Benefit Analysis of Boat Lifts
Page 59 and 60: Non-Lethal Impact Munitions (NLIM)
Page 61 and 62: Arctic Operations Support 2013 Miss
Page 63 and 64: Joint Marine Test Detachment In-Sit
Page 65 and 66: Surface Branch Support Mission Need
Page 67 and 68: FY14 Project Portfolio Externally F
Page 69 and 70:
Operational Testing of Electro-Opti
Page 71 and 72:
Polar Icebreaker Acquisition Suppor
Page 73 and 74:
Seakeeping vs. Ice Breaking Capabil
Page 75 and 76:
Independent Assessment of OPTIDE an
Page 77 and 78:
AIS Transmit Capability Mission Nee
Page 79 and 80:
General Engineering Laboratory Supp
Page 81 and 82:
Maritime Trace Narcotic Identificat
Page 83 and 84:
Improved In-Situ Burning (ISB) for
Page 85 and 86:
GLRI BWT Shipboard Approval Tests M
Page 87 and 88:
Develop CG Guidance to Verify Balla
Page 89 and 90:
Ballast Water Management System (BW
Page 91 and 92:
CYBER Defense for Maritime Position
Page 93 and 94:
Lighting Assessment for the Bridge
Page 95 and 96:
Portable Maritime Explosive Detecti
Page 97 and 98:
Migrant Identification/Accountabili
Page 99 and 100:
Develop an Environmentally Friendly
Page 101 and 102:
Cocaine Purity and Signature Test M
Page 103 and 104:
CD/AMIO Deterrence Metric System an
Page 105 and 106:
Radio Frequency Vessel Stopping Mis
Page 107:
Prototype Hoax Location System Deve
show all

FY14 RDT&E Project Portfolio - USCG - U.S. Coast Guard

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?