14.01.2014 Views

Johannes Althusius: Politica - Hubertlerch.com - HubertLerch.com

Johannes Althusius: Politica - Hubertlerch.com - HubertLerch.com

Johannes Althusius: Politica - Hubertlerch.com - HubertLerch.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Althusius</strong>_0002<br />

9/10/05 4:09 PM<br />

you will be a holy people to Jehovah your God, as he has spoken.”<br />

18<br />

At the present time, as well, kings are bound by<br />

agreements to care for the approved religion, and to remove unapproved religion.<br />

19<br />

[§ 16] This religious covenant may be confirmed by the oath of the promisers—the people and supreme magistrate—in which<br />

they swear that they will devote themselves to those things that pertain to the conservation of the church and the kingdom of<br />

God.<br />

20<br />

[§ 17] The debtors in this religious covenant are those who make the promise, or the supreme magistrate of the realm<br />

and its ephors together with the entire people. The creditor is God to whom the promise is made. The debtors jointly obligate<br />

themselves by indicating that they intend to render to God the things that are his, namely, the cultivation of the true knowledge<br />

and pious worship of him in the realm according to the Word of God, not according to the pleasure or mandate of men. …<br />

[§ 18] The supreme magistrate of the realm and the ephors representing the people are the debtors in such a manner that the<br />

fulfillment of their promise can be entirely and continuously demanded of both magistrate and ephors as if each were the<br />

principal obligant.<br />

21<br />

For God does not will that the church, or the responsibility for acknowledging and worshiping him, be<br />

<strong>com</strong>mitted to one person alone, but to the entire people represented by its ministers, ephors, and supreme magistrate. These<br />

administrators represent the people as if they corporately sustain the church as one person, and yet as if anyone from among<br />

them were obligated for the entire responsibility. …<br />

22<br />

[§ 19] God makes a promise to the magistrate and people in this religious covenant concerning those who perform these things,<br />

as well as a threat to those who neglect or violate this <strong>com</strong>pact ( fedus). He promises to those who perform them that he will be<br />

to them a benevolent God and a merciful protector. He threatens those who disobey and violate this <strong>com</strong>pact that he will be a<br />

just and severe exactor of punishments. …<br />

God is the vindicator of this covenant when it is violated by the magistrate or by the ephors representing the people. One debtor<br />

is held responsible for the fault of the other, and shares his sins if he does not hold the violator of this covenant to his duty, and<br />

resist and impede him so far as he is able. “He will cast Israel down because of the sins of Jeroboam.”<br />

23<br />

For this reason the<br />

ephors are expected to remind a deviating magistrate of his duty, and to resist him. Therefore, if the ephors do not do this, but<br />

by remaining silent, defaulting, dissembling, permitting, or submitting they do not obstruct the violation of this covenant by the<br />

supreme magistrate, they are deservedly punished by God for this fault and surrender, as many examples indicate.…<br />

24<br />

[§ 23] William Barclay disagrees with the things we have said about this covenant and <strong>com</strong>pact.<br />

25<br />

He asserts that such a<br />

<strong>com</strong>pact was employed among the Jews in a time of interregnum and in a democratic state of affairs, and accepts it only in this<br />

sense. But he greatly errs in this. For the texts prove most conclusively that such a <strong>com</strong>pact also occurred among prince and<br />

people under the monarchy.<br />

26<br />

And they demonstrate that the nature and purpose of this <strong>com</strong>pact is such that it is useful and<br />

necessary in any type of <strong>com</strong>monwealth.<br />

Concerning this <strong>com</strong>pact entered into by the king and people with God, Barclay furthermore adds that he thinks any party<br />

whatever can individually uphold it by not allowing itself to be led away from true religion. And this the people can do.<br />

27<br />

He says<br />

this <strong>com</strong>pact in itself grants no right and imperium, neither to the people over the king, nor to the king over the people. It<br />

merely makes both debtors to God alone. Barclay says something important here, and omits something else.<br />

28<br />

For no one can<br />

doubt that such a <strong>com</strong>pact or covenant constitutes a right and obligation both to God and between the promising debtors,<br />

namely, between the people and the king. What is at stake in this obligation is not only the public practice of orthodox religion<br />

and the honest worship of God, but also the second table of the Decalogue, of the correct and honest administration of justice.<br />

This is to say, both tables are involved.<br />

29<br />

[§ 24] I concede to Barclay that in a case in which two debtors jointly promise to do something, if one fulfills what is promised,<br />

the other is released from it. Therefore, when either the king or the people has been afflicted with punishment by God because of<br />

their crime and transgression against the agreed <strong>com</strong>pact, the other shall be released from it. But this rule—in which one debtor<br />

who fulfills an obligation releases the other debtor—permits an exception in the case in which a debtor fulfills not the entire<br />

obligation, but only his own part of it. Here one of the debtors who suffers the penalties of God cannot thereby discharge the<br />

entire obligation. …<br />

[§ 25] LET US NOW FOLLOW THROUGH with the two duties of ecclesiastical administration that we have mentioned. The first duty,<br />

which is the introduction of the doctrine and practice of orthodox religion in the realm, consists of the establishment of a sacred<br />

http://oll.libertyfund.org/Home3/EBook.php?recordID=0002<br />

Page 102 of 132

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!