Johannes Althusius: Politica - Hubertlerch.com - HubertLerch.com
Johannes Althusius: Politica - Hubertlerch.com - HubertLerch.com
Johannes Althusius: Politica - Hubertlerch.com - HubertLerch.com
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Althusius</strong>_0002<br />
9/10/05 4:09 PM<br />
understanding of the centrality and continuity of the principle of rule in all associations.]<br />
[6] “Then Samuel proclaimed the right of the realm ( jus regni) among the people, and wrote it in a certain book.” I Samuel<br />
10:25.<br />
[7]<br />
[In the equivalent chapter (VI) of the edition of 1603, <strong>Althusius</strong> limited the right of sovereignty to the power of<br />
administration, which he placed under the fundamental right or law of the realm. Here, of course, it is identified with this right or<br />
law. Sovereignty henceforth pertains to the people and their constitution, not merely to the chief administrator and his actions.]<br />
[8] Fernando Vásquez Illustrium controversiarum, I, 47; Bartolus, Commentarii (Digest I, 1, 9; I, 4, 1; I, 1, 5; XII, 6, 64);<br />
Conrad Lancellot, Templum omnium judicum, I, 2; Paul Castro, Commentaria (Digest I, 1, 5).<br />
[9] Digest III, 4, 7, 1.<br />
[10] See Francis Hotman, De antiquo jure regni Gallici, I, 19 and 23; Fernando Vásquez, Illustrium controversiarum, I, 47.<br />
[11] However, Vásquez wrongly rejects this <strong>com</strong>parison.<br />
[12] Roland a Valle, Consiliorum, I, cons. 1, num. 138; Marc Antony Natta, Consilia, cons. 636 and 640;<br />
Charles Dumoulin, Consuetudines Parisienses, tit. 1, art 8, glos 4, num. 16 f.; Diego Covarruvias, Practicarum quaestionium, 4.<br />
[13] The Commonweale, I, 8. Jacob Bornitius further develops his idea of sovereignty in De majestate politica, I.<br />
[14] See also Deuteronomy 17:18–20; Joshua 1:7 f.; Psalm 119.<br />
[15] Commentarii (Digest IV, 4, 38).<br />
[16] The City of God, IV, 4.<br />
[17] [<strong>Althusius</strong> seems to make no distinction between lex divina et naturalis and jus divinum et naturale. ]<br />
[18] Matthew 7:12; Luke 6:31.<br />
[19] Jacob Bornitius, however, would indiscriminately subordinate the prince to civil law to the extent that such law can be<br />
analogically ac<strong>com</strong>modated to him. De majestate politica, I, 10.<br />
[20] The Commonweale, I, 7 and 8.<br />
[21]<br />
Chapters XVIII and XIX.<br />
[22] Illustrium controversiarum, I, 26 and 45.<br />
[23] The City of God, XIX, 15. [XIX, 14 in the Modern Library edition.]<br />
[24] Timothy 2:2.<br />
[25] Titus 2:12.<br />
[26] Histories, VI, 47.<br />
[27] [ <strong>com</strong>munio: <strong>com</strong>munication; sharing.]<br />
[28]<br />
The rest of this chapter and the whole of Chapters X-XVII.]<br />
[29] Chapter XVIII and following.<br />
[30] [The rest of this chapter is devoted to ecclesiastical <strong>com</strong>munion, and Chapter XXVII to secular <strong>com</strong>munion. Ecclesiastical<br />
matters will be discussed again in Chapter XXVIII, but therein as an element of administration, not as part of the discussion of<br />
<strong>com</strong>munion. Note also that <strong>Althusius</strong> uses “<strong>com</strong>munication” and “<strong>com</strong>munion” interchangeably]<br />
http://oll.libertyfund.org/Home3/EBook.php?recordID=0002<br />
Page 58 of 132