14.01.2014 Views

Johannes Althusius: Politica - Hubertlerch.com - HubertLerch.com

Johannes Althusius: Politica - Hubertlerch.com - HubertLerch.com

Johannes Althusius: Politica - Hubertlerch.com - HubertLerch.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Althusius</strong>_0002<br />

9/10/05 4:09 PM<br />

realm united together exercise this right of electing collectively, not individually, unless certain ones among them hold this right<br />

by the <strong>com</strong>mon consent of all. … [§ 29] In this election conducted in the name of the associated people as the mandator,<br />

certain laws and conditions concerning subjection, and the form and manner of the future imperium, are proposed to the<br />

prospective magistrate as the mandatory. If he accepts these laws, and swears to the people to observe them, the election is<br />

considered firm and settled. This agreement entered into between magistrate and people is known as a mutually binding<br />

obligation. …<br />

[§ 30] The conditions and laws of subjection, or the form, manner, and limits of the entrusted imperium, are customarily<br />

defined in certain articles that are publicly read and proposed by one of the ephors to the magistrate to be elected. Then this<br />

ephor asks whether the magistrate is willing to abide by these articles in the administration of the realm, and solemnly binds his<br />

assurances by a written oath. …<br />

[§ 33] But if no laws or conditions have been expressed in the election, and the people has subjected itself to such a magistrate<br />

without them, then whatever things are holy, fair, and just, and are contained in the Decalogue, are considered to have been<br />

expressed, and the people is considered in the election to have subjected itself to the imperium of the magistrate according to<br />

them.<br />

12<br />

Indeed, there is no instance in which a people has conferred upon a prince the unrestrained licence to bring about its<br />

own ruin.<br />

13<br />

For a people when questioned could have doubtlessly responded that it had granted no power to ac<strong>com</strong>plish its own<br />

ruin. …<br />

14<br />

[§ 35] If the people or <strong>com</strong>monwealth has conferred all its right and imperium upon the supreme magistrate, as it is said in the<br />

Digest,<br />

15<br />

or yields to him supreme power free from laws and without any reservation, exception, or condition, then the general<br />

wording is to be closely interpreted according to the subject matter—to the extent that the subject matter manifestly permits—so<br />

that whatever is the nature of imperium or reign, such is to be the interpretation of this general wording. The nature of<br />

magistracy and imperium is that they regard the utility of subjects, not the benefit of the one who exercises the imperium, and<br />

they administer the <strong>com</strong>monwealth according to right reason and justice. For, as Augustine says, when justice is taken away,<br />

what are realms other than large bands of robbers?<br />

16<br />

And so absolute power and the jurisdiction of sinning cannot be given to the<br />

supreme magistrate. Therefore, even a concession made with the most general wording is to be interpreted in support of the<br />

welfare and utility of the conceding people. For the mind of the conceding people was surely that which restricts and limits the<br />

general wording. [§ 36] Indeed, the people in constituting a prince by no means intended to elect a tyrant to the ruin of itself,<br />

or to lose the capacity to protect itself. For a prince can easily degenerate into a tyrant or do what is contrary to nature, so that<br />

the power of the one may then be greater than the power of the whole. So even in a general mandate or concession, things are<br />

not included that anyone would not have conceded in a special mandate, especially those things that tend toward the ruin of the<br />

conceder, the destruction of human society, and the violation of divine law.<br />

I add that no one can renounce the right of defense against violence and injury. And the power of correcting an errant king, which<br />

the ephors have, has not been transferred to the king and cannot be so transferred. Nor can the supreme right in a<br />

<strong>com</strong>monwealth be transferred, because it is by nature in<strong>com</strong>municable, and remains with the body of the universal<br />

association. [§ 37] Moreover, there is no power for evil or for inflicting injury. There is only power for good and for giving<br />

support, and thus for the utility and welfare of subjects. Therefore, the power that the people has, not a power that the people<br />

does not have, is considered to be given by this general wording. …<br />

17<br />

[§ 39] The laws and conditions by which Charles V swore allegiance when elected emperor are recorded by Jean Sleidan.<br />

18<br />

“1. He (Caesar) shall defend the Christian <strong>com</strong>monwealth, the pope, and the Roman church, of which he shall be the protector.<br />

2. He shall administer law ( jus) fairly, and seek peace.<br />

3. He shall not only confirm all the laws ( leges) of the imperium, and especially what they call the Golden Bull, but with the<br />

counsel of the electors he shall also amplify these laws when there is need to do so.<br />

4. He shall convene a senate chosen from Germans in the imperium, which will oversee the <strong>com</strong>monwealth.<br />

5. He shall not in the least rescind or diminish the rights, privileges, and dignities of princes and orders of the imperium.<br />

6. He shall permit the electors, when there is need, to convene among themselves and to deliberate concerning the<br />

http://oll.libertyfund.org/Home3/EBook.php?recordID=0002<br />

Page 82 of 132

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!