23.01.2014 Views

Modelling Dependence with Copulas - IFOR

Modelling Dependence with Copulas - IFOR

Modelling Dependence with Copulas - IFOR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2 <strong>Copulas</strong><br />

Here C α1(X 1),α 2(X 2) is the survival copula, Ĉ, ofX 1 and X 2 , i.e.,<br />

H(x 1 ,x 2 )=P[X 1 >x 1 ,X 2 >x 2 ]=Ĉ(F 1(x 1 ), F 2 (x 2 )).<br />

Consider the trivariate case.<br />

Let α 1 , α 2 and α 3 be strictly decreasing. Then<br />

C α1(X 1),α 2(X 2),α 3(X 3)(u 1 ,u 2 ,u 3 )=<br />

= C α2(X 2),α 3(X 3)(u 2 ,u 3 ) − C X1,α 2(X 2),α 3(X 3)(1 − u 1 ,u 2 ,u 3 )<br />

= ...<br />

= u 1 + u 2 + u 3 − 2+C X1,X 2<br />

(1 − u 1 , 1 − u 2 )+C X1,X 3<br />

(1 − u 1 , 1 − u 3 )<br />

+C X2,X 3<br />

(1 − u 2 , 1 − u 3 ) − C X1,X 2,X 3<br />

(1 − u 1 , 1 − u 2 , 1 − u 3 ).<br />

Here C α1(X 1),α 2(X 2),α 3(X 3) is the survival copula of X 1 ,X 2 ,X 3 .<br />

Note also that the joint survival function of n uniform (0, 1) random variables<br />

whose joint distribution function is the copula C is<br />

C(u 1 ,u 2 ,... ,u n )=Ĉ(1 − u 1, 1 − u 2 ,... ,1 − u n ).<br />

Although most results could be presented <strong>with</strong>out needing measure theory,<br />

there are results in the remaining sections that are best presented and understood<br />

using some terminology and results from measure theory. Each joint distribution<br />

H induces a probability measure on R n via V H ((−∞,x 1 ] × (−∞,x 2 ] ×<br />

...× (−∞,x n ]) = H(x 1 ,x 2 ,... ,x n ). Since copulas are joint distribution functions,<br />

each copula induces a probability measure on I n via V C ([0,u 1 ]×[0,u 2 ] ...×[0,u n ]) =<br />

C(u 1 ,u 2 ,... ,u n ). Hence, at an intuitive level, the C-measure of a subset of I n is<br />

the probability that n uniform (0, 1) random variables <strong>with</strong> joint distribution C<br />

assume values in that subset.<br />

For any copula C, let<br />

where<br />

C(u 1 ,u 2 ,... ,u n )=A C (u 1 ,u 2 ,... ,u n )+S C (u 1 ,u 2 ,... ,u n ),<br />

∫ u1<br />

∫ un<br />

A C (u 1 ,... ,u n ) =<br />

∂ n<br />

...<br />

C(u 1 ,... ,u n )ds 1 ... ds n ,<br />

0 0 ∂u 1 ...∂u n<br />

S C (u 1 ,... ,u n ) = C(u 1 ,... ,u n ) − A C (u 1 ,... ,u n ).<br />

Unlike multivariate distributions in general, the margins of a copula are continuous,<br />

hence a copula has no individual points in I n whose C-measure is positive.<br />

If C = A C on I n then C is said to be absolutely continuous. In this case C has<br />

∂<br />

density<br />

n<br />

∂u 1...∂u n<br />

C(u 1 ,... ,u n ).<br />

If C = S C on I n ∂<br />

then C is said to be singular, and n<br />

∂u 1...∂u n<br />

C(u 1 ,... ,u n )=0<br />

almost everywhere in I n .<br />

The support of a copula is the complement of the union of all open subsets of<br />

I n <strong>with</strong> C-measure 0. When the support of a copula C is I n , it is said to have “full<br />

support”. When C is singular its support has Lebesgue measure zero and conversely.<br />

However a copula can have full support <strong>with</strong>out being absolutely continuous.<br />

Example 2.4. Consider the bivariate Fréchet-Hoeffding upper bound M. Since<br />

∂ 2<br />

∂u∂v M(u, v) = 0 everywhere on I2 except on the main diagonal (which has Lebesgue<br />

measure zero), and the M-measure of every rectangle in I 2 entirely above or below<br />

the main diagonal is zero, M is singular. The support of M is the main diagonal of<br />

I 2 as shown in figure 2.1.<br />

Similarly the support of the bivariate Fréchet-Hoeffding lower bound W is the secondary<br />

diagonal of I 2 as shown in figure 2.1.<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!