Modelling Dependence with Copulas - IFOR
Modelling Dependence with Copulas - IFOR
Modelling Dependence with Copulas - IFOR
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2 <strong>Copulas</strong><br />
Here C α1(X 1),α 2(X 2) is the survival copula, Ĉ, ofX 1 and X 2 , i.e.,<br />
H(x 1 ,x 2 )=P[X 1 >x 1 ,X 2 >x 2 ]=Ĉ(F 1(x 1 ), F 2 (x 2 )).<br />
Consider the trivariate case.<br />
Let α 1 , α 2 and α 3 be strictly decreasing. Then<br />
C α1(X 1),α 2(X 2),α 3(X 3)(u 1 ,u 2 ,u 3 )=<br />
= C α2(X 2),α 3(X 3)(u 2 ,u 3 ) − C X1,α 2(X 2),α 3(X 3)(1 − u 1 ,u 2 ,u 3 )<br />
= ...<br />
= u 1 + u 2 + u 3 − 2+C X1,X 2<br />
(1 − u 1 , 1 − u 2 )+C X1,X 3<br />
(1 − u 1 , 1 − u 3 )<br />
+C X2,X 3<br />
(1 − u 2 , 1 − u 3 ) − C X1,X 2,X 3<br />
(1 − u 1 , 1 − u 2 , 1 − u 3 ).<br />
Here C α1(X 1),α 2(X 2),α 3(X 3) is the survival copula of X 1 ,X 2 ,X 3 .<br />
Note also that the joint survival function of n uniform (0, 1) random variables<br />
whose joint distribution function is the copula C is<br />
C(u 1 ,u 2 ,... ,u n )=Ĉ(1 − u 1, 1 − u 2 ,... ,1 − u n ).<br />
Although most results could be presented <strong>with</strong>out needing measure theory,<br />
there are results in the remaining sections that are best presented and understood<br />
using some terminology and results from measure theory. Each joint distribution<br />
H induces a probability measure on R n via V H ((−∞,x 1 ] × (−∞,x 2 ] ×<br />
...× (−∞,x n ]) = H(x 1 ,x 2 ,... ,x n ). Since copulas are joint distribution functions,<br />
each copula induces a probability measure on I n via V C ([0,u 1 ]×[0,u 2 ] ...×[0,u n ]) =<br />
C(u 1 ,u 2 ,... ,u n ). Hence, at an intuitive level, the C-measure of a subset of I n is<br />
the probability that n uniform (0, 1) random variables <strong>with</strong> joint distribution C<br />
assume values in that subset.<br />
For any copula C, let<br />
where<br />
C(u 1 ,u 2 ,... ,u n )=A C (u 1 ,u 2 ,... ,u n )+S C (u 1 ,u 2 ,... ,u n ),<br />
∫ u1<br />
∫ un<br />
A C (u 1 ,... ,u n ) =<br />
∂ n<br />
...<br />
C(u 1 ,... ,u n )ds 1 ... ds n ,<br />
0 0 ∂u 1 ...∂u n<br />
S C (u 1 ,... ,u n ) = C(u 1 ,... ,u n ) − A C (u 1 ,... ,u n ).<br />
Unlike multivariate distributions in general, the margins of a copula are continuous,<br />
hence a copula has no individual points in I n whose C-measure is positive.<br />
If C = A C on I n then C is said to be absolutely continuous. In this case C has<br />
∂<br />
density<br />
n<br />
∂u 1...∂u n<br />
C(u 1 ,... ,u n ).<br />
If C = S C on I n ∂<br />
then C is said to be singular, and n<br />
∂u 1...∂u n<br />
C(u 1 ,... ,u n )=0<br />
almost everywhere in I n .<br />
The support of a copula is the complement of the union of all open subsets of<br />
I n <strong>with</strong> C-measure 0. When the support of a copula C is I n , it is said to have “full<br />
support”. When C is singular its support has Lebesgue measure zero and conversely.<br />
However a copula can have full support <strong>with</strong>out being absolutely continuous.<br />
Example 2.4. Consider the bivariate Fréchet-Hoeffding upper bound M. Since<br />
∂ 2<br />
∂u∂v M(u, v) = 0 everywhere on I2 except on the main diagonal (which has Lebesgue<br />
measure zero), and the M-measure of every rectangle in I 2 entirely above or below<br />
the main diagonal is zero, M is singular. The support of M is the main diagonal of<br />
I 2 as shown in figure 2.1.<br />
Similarly the support of the bivariate Fréchet-Hoeffding lower bound W is the secondary<br />
diagonal of I 2 as shown in figure 2.1.<br />
8