23.01.2014 Views

Modelling Dependence with Copulas - IFOR

Modelling Dependence with Copulas - IFOR

Modelling Dependence with Copulas - IFOR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3 <strong>Dependence</strong><br />

3.2 Perfect <strong>Dependence</strong><br />

For every n-copula C we know from the Fréchet-Hoeffding inequality that<br />

W n (u 1 ,u 2 ,... ,u n ) ≤ C(u 1 ,u 2 ,... ,u n ) ≤ M n (u 1 ,u 2 ,... ,u n ).<br />

Furthermore, for n = 2 the upper and lower bounds are themselves copulas and we<br />

have seen that W and M are the bivariate distributions functions of the random<br />

vectors (U, 1 − U) and(U, U) respectively where U is uniform (0, 1). In this case we<br />

say that W describes perfect negative dependence and M describes perfect positive<br />

dependence.<br />

Theorem 3.1. Let (X, Y ) have one of the copulas W or M. Then there exists two<br />

monotonic functions α, β : R −→ R and a real-valued random variable Z so that<br />

(X, Y )= d (α(Z),β(Z)),<br />

<strong>with</strong> α increasing and β decreasing in the former case and both α and β increasing<br />

in the latter case. The converse of this result is also true.<br />

For the proof, see Embrechts, McNeil and Straumann (1999) [3].<br />

Definition 9. If (X, Y ) has the copula M then X and Y are said to be comonotonic;<br />

if it has the copula W they are said to be countermonotonic.<br />

Note that if any of F 1 and F 2 (the distribution functions of X and Y respectively)<br />

have discontinuities so that the copula is not unique, then W and M are possible<br />

copulas.<br />

In the case of F 1 and F 2 being continuous a stronger version of the result can<br />

be stated:<br />

C = W ⇔ Y = T (X) a.s., T = F2 −1 ◦ (1 − F 1 ) decreasing,<br />

C = M ⇔ Y = T (X) a.s., T = F2 −1 ◦ F 1 increasing.<br />

3.3 Concordance<br />

Let (x i ,y i )and(x j ,y j ) be two observations from a random vector (X, Y ) of continuous<br />

random variables. We say that (x i ,y i )and(x j ,y j ) are concordant if x i y j . Similarly we say that (x i ,y i )and(x j ,y j ) are<br />

discordant if x i y j ,orifx i >x j and y i 0, and discordant<br />

if (x i − x j )(y i − y j ) < 0.<br />

3.3.1 Kendall’s tau<br />

The sample version of the measure of association known as Kendall’s tau is defined<br />

in terms of concordance as follows: Let {(x 1 ,y 1 ), (x 2 ,y 2 ),... ,(x n ,y n )} denote a<br />

sample of n observations from a random vector (X, Y ) of continuous random variables.<br />

Each of the ( n<br />

2)<br />

distinct pairs (xi ,y i )and(x j ,y j ) of observations in the sample<br />

is either concordant or discordant. Let c and d denote the number of concordant<br />

and discordant pairs respectively. Then Kendall’s tau for the sample is<br />

( )<br />

c − d<br />

n<br />

c + d =(c − d)/ .<br />

2<br />

The population version of Kendall’s tau (simply denoted Kendall’s tau) for continuous<br />

random variables is defined similarly. Let (X 1 ,Y 1 )and(X 2 ,Y 2 ) be independent<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!