23.01.2014 Views

Modelling Dependence with Copulas - IFOR

Modelling Dependence with Copulas - IFOR

Modelling Dependence with Copulas - IFOR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9 <strong>Modelling</strong> Extremal Events in Practice<br />

is used, where τ stands for Kendall’s tau.<br />

However, this choice of copula might prove dangerous. Since the value of the<br />

contract depends on simultaneous exceedences, a copula such as the Gaussian would<br />

result in a price too low if the true dependence structure has the property of upper<br />

tail dependence and the thresholds were high enough. The seller of the contract<br />

would then tend to undervalue the contract. A safer approach from the sellers point<br />

of view would be to use a Gumbel copula. From the expression for the bivariate<br />

Gumbel survival copula it follows that for the bivariate case the probability of<br />

payout is given by<br />

P[N =2] = Ĉ(F 1(k 1 ), F 2 (k 2 ))<br />

(<br />

= F 1 (k 1 )+F 2 (k 2 ) − 1+exp −[(− ln F 1 (k 1 )) θ +(− ln F 2 (k 2 )) θ ] 1/θ) .<br />

For higher dimensions we use the multivariate extension of the Gumbel family<br />

presented in chapter 5.5. For the trivariate case we have<br />

P[N =3] = Ĉ(F 1(k 1 ), F 2 (k 2 )F 3 (k 3 ))<br />

= F 1 (k 1 )+F 2 (k 2 )+F 3 (k 3 ) − 2<br />

+C θ2 (F 1 (k 1 ),F 2 (k 2 )) + C θ1 (F 1 (k 1 ),F 3 (k 3 )) + C θ1 (F 2 (k 2 ),F 3 (k 3 ))<br />

−C θ1,θ 2<br />

(F 1 (k 1 ),F 2 (k 2 ),F 3 (k 3 )),<br />

where<br />

and<br />

C θ1,θ 2<br />

(u 1 ,u 2 ,u 3 )=exp{−<br />

)<br />

C θi (u, v) =exp<br />

(−[(− ln u) θi +(− ln v) θi ] 1/θi<br />

(<br />

[(− ln u 1 ) θ2 +(− ln u 2 ) θ2 ] θ1/θ2 +(− ln u 3 ) θ1 ) 1/θ1}.<br />

To parametrizise the Gumbel copulas the relation<br />

1<br />

θ i =<br />

, i =1,...,n− 1<br />

1 − τ 1,n−i+1<br />

is used.<br />

To compare the effect of the Gumbel dependence structure <strong>with</strong> the Gaussian, let<br />

X i ∼Lognormal(0, 1) for all i, k i = k for all i and τ(X i ,X j )=0.5 for all i ≠ j.<br />

This gives<br />

( )<br />

( )<br />

n n<br />

P[N = n] =1+(−1) 1 C 1 (F (k)) + ···+(−1) n C n (F (k),...,F(k)),<br />

1<br />

n<br />

where C 1 (u) =u and C m (u 1 ,...,u m )isthem-margin of C n (u 1 ,...,u n )form ∈<br />

{2,...,n− 1}.<br />

In the Gumbel case<br />

C m (F (k),...,F(k)) = exp{−[(− ln F (k)) θ + ···+(− ln F (k)) θ ] 1/θ } = F (k) m1/θ<br />

and in the Gaussian case<br />

C m (F (k),...,F(k)) = Φ m ρ l<br />

(Φ −1 (F (k)),...,Φ −1 (F (k))),<br />

where (to avoid complicated notation) ρ l = sin( π 2<br />

τ) denotes the single parameter of<br />

the equicorrelated Gaussian copula. Φ m ρ l<br />

(Φ −1 (F (k)),...,Φ −1 (F (k))) can be calculated<br />

by numerical integration using the fact that (see Johnson and Kotz p.48 [8])<br />

∫ ∞<br />

Φ m ρ l<br />

(a,...,a)= φ(x) [ ( √ ) a − ρl x ]m<br />

Φ √ dx,<br />

1 − ρl<br />

−∞<br />

68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!