Rural Development Policies and Sustainable Land Use in the ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

102 REFERENCES Pino, H. N., P. Jiménez, and A. Thorpe, eds. 1994. ¿Estado o mercado? Perspectivas para el desarrollo agrícola Centroamericano hacia el año 2000. Tegucigalpa, Honduras: POSCA-UNAH. Place, F., and P. Hazell. 1993. Productivity effects of indigenous land tenure systems in sub-Saharan Africa. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75 (1): 10–19. Place, F., B. M. Swallow, J. Wangila, and C. B. Barrett. 2002. Lessons for natural resources management technology adoption and research. In Natural resources management in African agriculture: Understanding and improving current practices, eds. C. B. Barrett, F. Place, and A. A. Aboud. Wallingford, U.K.: CAB International. PRAF (Programa de Asignación Familiar). 1998. Los censos de talla en Honduras. Una revisión de experiencia. Tegucigalpa, Honduras: Programa de Asignación Familiar. PRONADERS (Programe Nacional para el Desarrollo Rural Sostenible). 2000. Documento marco del Programa Nacional de Desarrollo Rural Sostenible. National Program for Sustainable Rural Development. Tegucigalpa, Honduras: Secretariat of Agriculture and Livestock. Quisumbing, A. R., and R. Meinzen-Dick. 2001. Overview. In Empowering women to achieve food security, eds. A. R. Quisumbing and R. Meinzen-Dick. 2020 Focus No. 6, Brief 1. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute. Rakodi, C. 1999. A capital assets framework for analysing household livelihood strategies: Implications for policy. Development Policy Review 17: 315–342. Reardon, T., J. Berdegué, and G. Escobar. 2001. Rural non-farm employment and incomes in Latin America: Overview and policy implications. World Development 29 (3): 395–409. Reddy, V. R., and J. Soussan. 2003. Assessing the impact of participatory watershed development: A sustainable livelihoods approach. In Methods for assessing the impact of natural resources management research, eds. B. Shiferaw and H. A. Freeman. Patancheru, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. Ruben, R., and J. Pender. 2004. Rural diversity and heterogeneity in less-favoured areas: The quest for policy targeting. Food Policy 29: 303–320. Ruben, R., and M. van den Berg. 2001. Non-farm employment and poverty alleviation of rural farm households in Honduras. World Development 29 (3): 549–560. RUTA (Regional Unit for Technical Assistance). 1998. Estrategia para el desarrollo del sector agroexportador no tradicional al año 2020. San José, Costa Rica: Unidad Regional de Asistencia Técnica para Centroamérica. SAG (Secretariat of Agriculture and Livestock). 2002. Compendio estadístico agropecuario 2001. Tegucigalpa, Honduras: Secretariat of Agriculture and Livestock, Planning and Evaluation Unit. ———. 2004. Política de estado para el sector agroalimentario y el medio rural de Honduras. Mesa agrícola hondureña, secretaria técnica. Tegucigalpa, Honduras: Secretariat of Agriculture and Livestock. Salgado, R., P. Jiménez, H. Chávez, H. Noé Pino, and J. Malmed Sanjak. 1994. El mercado de tierras en Honduras. POSCAE—University of Wisconsin–Madison. Sauma, P. 2002. La pobreza en Centroamérica en los noventa. Paper presented at the DFID workshop Taller sobre políticas y reducción de la pobreza rural—enfocando el diálogo sobre experiencias en Nicaragua y Honduras, May 29–30, 2002, Tegucigalpa, Honduras. Scherr, S., and O. Neidecker-Gonzalez. 1997. Desarrollo sostenible de las laderas en Mesoamerica: Alcances y Potenciales. In Investigación sobre politicas para el desarrollo sostenible de las laderas Mesoamericanas, eds. S. Scherr, B. Miranda, and O. Neidecker-Gonzalez. San Salvador, El Salvador: IFPRI-IICA-CIMMYT. Schipper, R., J. Pender, H. G. P. Jansen, M. van den Berg, F. Kruijssen, P. Roebeling, and A. Damon. 2005. The impact of soil conservation practices and chemical fertilizer use on the production of basic grains in the hillsides of Honduras. Unpublished manuscript.
REFERENCES 103 Scoones, I. 1998. Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis. IDS Working Paper No. 72. Sussex, U.K.: Institute of Development Studies. Sen, A. 1975. Employment, technology, and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Serna Hidalgo, B., ed. 2003. Desafíos y oportunidades del desarrollo agropecuario sustentable centroamericano. Mexico City: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. Thorpe, A. 2000. “Modernizing” agriculture: Neo-liberal land tenure reform in Honduras. In Current land policy in Latin America: Regulating land tenure under neo-liberalism, eds. A. Zoomers, and G. van der Haar. Amsterdam and Frankfurt: KIT and Iberoamericana/Vervuert Verlag. Thorpe, A., H. N. Pino, P. Jiménez, A. L. Restrepo, D. Suazo, and R. Salgado. 1995. Impacto del ajuste en el agro hondureño. Tegucigalpa, Honduras: Postgrado Centroamericano en Economía y Planificación del Desarrollo. Thurow, T. L., A. P. Thurow, X. Wu, and H. Perotto-Baldivioso. 2002. Targeting soil conservation investments in Honduras. Choices (summer): 20–25. Tracy, F. C. 1988. The natural resource management project in Honduras. In Conservation farming on steep lands, eds. W. C. Moldenbauer and N. W. Hudson. Ankeny, Iowa: Soil and Water Conservation Society. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 1998. Informe sobre desarrollo humano. Honduras: 1998. Tegucigalpa, Honduras: UNDP. Varangis, P., P. Siegel, D. Giovannucci, and B. Lewin. 2003. Dealing with the coffee crisis in Central America. Policy Research Working Paper 29943, Development Research Group. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. Vosti, S., and T. Reardon, eds. 1997. Sustainability, growth and poverty alleviation: A policy and agroecological perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Walker, I., and J. Medina Oviedo. 2000. Agenda para la competitividad y el desarrollo sostenible en el Siglo XXI. Cambio Empresarial, No. 11, Vol. VIII—2000. Tegucigalpa, Honduras. Walker, I., and H. N. Pino. 2002. Desarrollo rural y pobreza en Honduras y Nicaragua: ¿Qué sigue? Estudio de caso: Políticas estrategias y acciones en desarrollo rural y reducción de pobreza en Honduras. Paper presented at the DFID workshop Taller sobre políticas y reducción de la pobreza rural—enfocando el diálogo sobre experiencias en Nicaragua y Honduras, May 29–30, 2002, Tegucigalpa, Honduras. Wielemaker, W. 2002. Methods. Unpublished methodology document for the analysis of biophysical information. Wageningen, The Netherlands. Wishart, D. 1999. ClustanGraphics Primer: A guide to cluster analysis. Edinburgh: Clustan Limited. World Bank. 2000. Honduras country assistance strategy. Washington, D.C.: Central America Country Management Unit, Latin America and the Caribbean Region, World Bank. ———. 2003. Honduras country assistance strategy. Report 25873-HO. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. ———. 2004a. Honduras development policy review. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. ———. 2004b. World development indicators. CD-ROM. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Page 1 and 2:
Rural Development Policies and Sust
Page 3 and 4:
Contents List of Tables iv List of
Page 5 and 6:
TABLES v 5.6 Determinants of extern
Page 7 and 8:
Boxes 1.1 Defining “Hillsides,”
Page 9 and 10:
Acknowledgments The authors acknowl
Page 11:
SUMMARY xi the adoption of sustaina
Page 14 and 15:
2 CHAPTER 1 Box 1.1 Defining “Hil
Page 16 and 17:
4 CHAPTER 1 will allow Honduras to
Page 18 and 19:
6 CHAPTER 1 In addition to providin
Page 20 and 21:
8 CHAPTER 1 econometric analysis to
Page 22 and 23:
10 CHAPTER 2 1998 and the coffee cr
Page 24 and 25:
12 CHAPTER 2 Box 2.1 Land Issues in
Page 26 and 27:
14 CHAPTER 2 Table 2.3 Yield of pri
Page 28 and 29:
16 CHAPTER 2 Table 2.7 Intersectora
Page 30 and 31:
18 CHAPTER 2 Figure 2.2 Terms of tr
Page 32 and 33:
CHAPTER 3 Methods and Models In thi
Page 34 and 35:
22 CHAPTER 3 Figure 3.1 Sustainable
Page 36 and 37:
24 CHAPTER 3 financial organization
Page 38 and 39:
26 CHAPTER 3 decide the number of c
Page 40 and 41:
28 CHAPTER 3 The reduced form versi
Page 42 and 43:
30 CHAPTER 3 Table 3.1 Variables in
Page 44 and 45:
32 CHAPTER 3 of years of formal sch
Page 46 and 47:
34 CHAPTER 3 Key socioeconomic elem
Page 48 and 49:
36 CHAPTER 3 although we report the
Page 50 and 51:
38 CHAPTER 4 Table 4.1 Natural capi
Page 52 and 53:
40 CHAPTER 4 Box 4.1 Remittances Re
Page 54 and 55:
42 CHAPTER 4 Table 4.6 Access to pu
Page 56 and 57:
44 CHAPTER 4 strategy (clusters 1 a
Page 58 and 59:
Table 4.8 Mean household net income
Page 60 and 61:
48 CHAPTER 4 Table 4.9 Summary stat
Page 62 and 63:
50 CHAPTER 4 Box 4.2 Gender in the
Page 64 and 65: 52 CHAPTER 5 The socioeconomic expl
Page 66 and 67: 54 CHAPTER 5 explanatory variables
Page 68 and 69: 56 CHAPTER 5 technology training) a
Page 70 and 71: 58 CHAPTER 5 Table 5.3 Determinants
Page 74 and 75: 62 CHAPTER 5 the basic grains/lives
Page 76 and 77: 64 CHAPTER 5 Table 5.5—Continued
Page 78 and 79: 66 CHAPTER 5 ambiguous effects, dep
Page 82 and 83: 70 CHAPTER 5 more livestock focus m
Page 86 and 87: 74 CHAPTER 5 Geographic determinant
Page 92 and 93: 80 CHAPTER 5 when they purchase it
Page 94 and 95: 82 CHAPTER 5 Table 5.10 Summary of
Page 96 and 97: 84 CHAPTER 5 able to compensate for
Page 98 and 99: 86 CHAPTER 5 On the other hand, edu
Page 100 and 101: 88 CHAPTER 5 and wage labor. Nevert
Page 102 and 103: 90 CHAPTER 5 productivity. 62 Incre
Page 104 and 105: CHAPTER 6 Summary of Findings, Conc
Page 106 and 107: 94 CHAPTER 6 zero/minimum tillage,
Page 108 and 109: 96 CHAPTER 6 Develop and promote yi
Page 110 and 111: 98 REFERENCES Boucher, S., B. Barha
Page 112 and 113: 100 REFERENCES Hornby, A. S. 1974.
show all

Rural Development Policies and Sustainable Land Use in the ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?