Synthesis Report - European Commission - Europa
Synthesis Report - European Commission - Europa
Synthesis Report - European Commission - Europa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Ex-post Evaluation of the ERDF 2000-2006<br />
<strong>Synthesis</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />
implementation. Nor were there many attempts to monitor the effect of programmes in this<br />
regard or to set up an indicator system for doing so.<br />
Moreover, the regions in which special units were set up specifically to deal with gender equality<br />
issues were a minority of the regions examined as part of the evaluation. The other regions had<br />
not put in place any machinery or procedures for integrating the issue into the planning or<br />
management process. Perhaps because of this, there was little evidence of awareness among<br />
regional and local authorities of the potentially important effect on women of the kinds of project<br />
listed above, except those which have a clear impact on them, the provision of childcare centres,<br />
in particular, despite them being the prime beneficiaries.<br />
In consequence, little or no account was taken of the specific needs of women, so that the effect<br />
on them was less than it might have been.<br />
More generally, the lack of indicators means that it is not possible to assess the extent to which<br />
the inclusion of gender equality as a horizontal issue in the cohesion policy guidelines had a<br />
tangible effect on the situation of women relative to men.<br />
Box – Support for social infrastructure in Castilla y Leon<br />
In Castilla y Leon the ERDF supported the construction of 47 health centres and the enlargement<br />
and refurbishment of 91 health centres, 24-hour medical attention centres and hospitals providing<br />
services locally to the elderly, those with disabilities and other vulnerable groups. The projects<br />
were carried out in rural and urban locations, with small towns (with a population of less than<br />
20,000) benefiting the most. The result was an improvement in the living conditions of rural<br />
populations by reducing the need to travel to larger towns to access health care services and<br />
receive medical treatment. The work-life balance of carers in rural areas, generally women, equally<br />
improved due to a reduction in their work-load. In addition, there was an increase in employment<br />
opportunities at local level, especially for women. The total budget was just under 9% of the total<br />
support from the ERDF.<br />
Demographic trends<br />
There is little or no evidence that demographic trends had any influence on the allocation of ERDF<br />
support over the period or that they were taken into account by the authorities across the EU in<br />
the selection of projects or their design.<br />
As in the case of gender equality, while a number of transport projects, projects undertaken in<br />
planning and rehabilitation programmes and the construction of various kinds of social<br />
infrastructure particularly affected older age groups and/or migrants, there was little awareness<br />
of this. Accordingly, their specific needs were not explicitly considered.<br />
Although an ageing population and the inflow, or outflow, of migrants have particularly important<br />
implications for some regions, no evidence of this affecting the pursuit of cohesion policy in the<br />
12 case study regions came to light. The evaluation did, however, find evidence of growing<br />
awareness of the potential significance of demographic trends as well as evidence that the ERDF<br />
could contribute to the implementation of measures for responding to the effects of these trends.<br />
3.9.3 The issues to arise<br />
The evidence from the evaluation is that the inclusion of gender equality as a horizontal<br />
requirement when designing and implementing programmes had only limited effect on the<br />
projects undertaken over the period. This prompts the question of whether it is worthwhile<br />
including such cross-cutting priorities in the cohesion policy guidelines in future.<br />
109