Synthesis Report - European Commission - Europa
Synthesis Report - European Commission - Europa
Synthesis Report - European Commission - Europa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Synthesis</strong> <strong>Report</strong> Ex-post Evaluation of the ERDF 2000-2006<br />
It is difficult to capture the multiplicity of aspects which contribute to well-being, but it is<br />
possible to measure one major dimension at least, which is the income per head of people living<br />
in different regions. Since cohesion policy is concerned with social disparities as well as economic<br />
ones and with maintaining and strengthening social cohesion, it is important to consider<br />
disparities in income levels between regions and how they changed over the programming period.<br />
A key question, therefore, is how far the reduction in regional disparities in GDP per head noted<br />
above was accompanied by a similar reduction in disposable household income per head.<br />
Unfortunately the data available at EU-level to investigate this question are not entirely<br />
satisfactory 17 . The figures presented in Table 2.6, therefore, should be regarded as indicative only<br />
and illustrative of the differences which exist between the series being compared. Moreover, it<br />
should be emphasised that the figures for disposable income per head do not take account of<br />
differences in the access of households to various services and amenities which are paid for out<br />
of taxes, such as childcare facilities as well as education, healthcare and so on. Such access tends<br />
to be much more similar across regions within countries, because they tend to share the same<br />
social protection systems and institutional arrangements, than across countries. Consequently,<br />
the figures in Table 2.6 are indicative of the changes in regional disparities in income per head,<br />
broadly defined, which occurred over the period but less so of the changes which occurred across<br />
the EU as a whole.<br />
Leaving the uncertainty aside, the data suggest that there was indeed a parallel narrowing of<br />
disparities in income per head across regions in the EU15 between 2000 and 2006 in line with the<br />
reduction in disparities in GDP per head. It also suggests that there was equally a narrowing of<br />
disparities in household income per head in the EU10 countries over the period in contrast to the<br />
widening in terms of GDP per head.<br />
2.3.5 Other aspects of well-being and territorial cohesion<br />
While data on income per head give some insight into how one major aspect of social disparities<br />
changed between regions over the programming period, as noted above, they give only a partial<br />
insight. To obtain a fuller picture, there is a need to take account of other aspects of well being<br />
and living standards which are more difficult both to identify indicators for and to find the data<br />
required to attach values to these indicators.<br />
One important aspect in this regard, as also noted above, is access to public goods and services,<br />
which governments across the EU have sought to make more equal between regions over the<br />
period and, indeed, have used financing from the Structural Funds for this purpose (as described<br />
in Chapter 4 below). No data exist, however, on the availability of various types of public good or<br />
on social benefits in kind (such as child or elderly care services) which could be used in order<br />
either to judge the achievements in this respect or to gauge the extent of regional disparities<br />
which exists in different countries 18 .<br />
17 Although Eurostat compiles and publishes data on disposable household income per head for NUTS 2 regions, the<br />
fluctuations from year to year in the figures suggests that they are subject to a relatively high degree of uncertainty.<br />
This applies especially to changes over time.<br />
18 There are data on government expenditure on goods and services of various kinds as well as on expenditure n<br />
social benefits in kind, but these exist only at the national level and, moreover, in the case of public goods, do not<br />
reflect the past investment which has been made in providing amenities of various kinds.<br />
62