13.02.2014 Views

Synthesis Report - European Commission - Europa

Synthesis Report - European Commission - Europa

Synthesis Report - European Commission - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Synthesis</strong> <strong>Report</strong> Ex-post Evaluation of the ERDF 2000-2006<br />

It is difficult to capture the multiplicity of aspects which contribute to well-being, but it is<br />

possible to measure one major dimension at least, which is the income per head of people living<br />

in different regions. Since cohesion policy is concerned with social disparities as well as economic<br />

ones and with maintaining and strengthening social cohesion, it is important to consider<br />

disparities in income levels between regions and how they changed over the programming period.<br />

A key question, therefore, is how far the reduction in regional disparities in GDP per head noted<br />

above was accompanied by a similar reduction in disposable household income per head.<br />

Unfortunately the data available at EU-level to investigate this question are not entirely<br />

satisfactory 17 . The figures presented in Table 2.6, therefore, should be regarded as indicative only<br />

and illustrative of the differences which exist between the series being compared. Moreover, it<br />

should be emphasised that the figures for disposable income per head do not take account of<br />

differences in the access of households to various services and amenities which are paid for out<br />

of taxes, such as childcare facilities as well as education, healthcare and so on. Such access tends<br />

to be much more similar across regions within countries, because they tend to share the same<br />

social protection systems and institutional arrangements, than across countries. Consequently,<br />

the figures in Table 2.6 are indicative of the changes in regional disparities in income per head,<br />

broadly defined, which occurred over the period but less so of the changes which occurred across<br />

the EU as a whole.<br />

Leaving the uncertainty aside, the data suggest that there was indeed a parallel narrowing of<br />

disparities in income per head across regions in the EU15 between 2000 and 2006 in line with the<br />

reduction in disparities in GDP per head. It also suggests that there was equally a narrowing of<br />

disparities in household income per head in the EU10 countries over the period in contrast to the<br />

widening in terms of GDP per head.<br />

2.3.5 Other aspects of well-being and territorial cohesion<br />

While data on income per head give some insight into how one major aspect of social disparities<br />

changed between regions over the programming period, as noted above, they give only a partial<br />

insight. To obtain a fuller picture, there is a need to take account of other aspects of well being<br />

and living standards which are more difficult both to identify indicators for and to find the data<br />

required to attach values to these indicators.<br />

One important aspect in this regard, as also noted above, is access to public goods and services,<br />

which governments across the EU have sought to make more equal between regions over the<br />

period and, indeed, have used financing from the Structural Funds for this purpose (as described<br />

in Chapter 4 below). No data exist, however, on the availability of various types of public good or<br />

on social benefits in kind (such as child or elderly care services) which could be used in order<br />

either to judge the achievements in this respect or to gauge the extent of regional disparities<br />

which exists in different countries 18 .<br />

17 Although Eurostat compiles and publishes data on disposable household income per head for NUTS 2 regions, the<br />

fluctuations from year to year in the figures suggests that they are subject to a relatively high degree of uncertainty.<br />

This applies especially to changes over time.<br />

18 There are data on government expenditure on goods and services of various kinds as well as on expenditure n<br />

social benefits in kind, but these exist only at the national level and, moreover, in the case of public goods, do not<br />

reflect the past investment which has been made in providing amenities of various kinds.<br />

62

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!