05.03.2014 Views

Use of Models and Facility-Level Data in Greenhouse Gas Inventories

Use of Models and Facility-Level Data in Greenhouse Gas Inventories

Use of Models and Facility-Level Data in Greenhouse Gas Inventories

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Use</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Models</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Facility</strong>-<strong>Level</strong> <strong>Data</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> <strong>Inventories</strong><br />

Abstract<br />

Implementation <strong>of</strong> the first m<strong>and</strong>atory greenhouse gas (GHG) report<strong>in</strong>g program <strong>in</strong> the United States began <strong>in</strong> earnest <strong>in</strong><br />

the end <strong>of</strong> 2009 with publication <strong>of</strong> the M<strong>and</strong>atory Report<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong>es Rule. This rule established EPA’s<br />

<strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> Report<strong>in</strong>g Program (GHGRP), which requires large direct emitters <strong>of</strong> GHGs, <strong>and</strong> suppliers <strong>of</strong> fossil<br />

fuels <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustrial gases to beg<strong>in</strong> data collection <strong>in</strong> 2010 <strong>and</strong> report their GHG emissions <strong>and</strong> other related data to EPA<br />

beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2011. Implementation <strong>of</strong> the GHGRP is a critical milestone for the United States, with the data gathered<br />

through the program serv<strong>in</strong>g the foundation for future climate policy. Policymakers <strong>and</strong> stakeholders at the local, state<br />

<strong>and</strong> national level are only beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g to realize what can be done with the reported data. For the first time, the public will<br />

be able to better underst<strong>and</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the large GHG emissions sources <strong>in</strong> their communities. State <strong>and</strong> national leaders<br />

will be better <strong>in</strong>formed to analyze the GHG emissions implications <strong>of</strong> potential climate policy options.<br />

Among the many beneficiaries <strong>of</strong> the data will be the team compil<strong>in</strong>g the Inventory <strong>of</strong> U.S. GHG Emissions <strong>and</strong> S<strong>in</strong>ks<br />

(U.S. GHG Inventory). This paper provides a background on the GHGRP <strong>and</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>s to explore the opportunities, <strong>and</strong><br />

challenges, associated with <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g the data gathered through that program <strong>in</strong>to the U.S. GHG Inventory. In<br />

particular, the paper reviews how the availability <strong>of</strong> facility-level data could impact the fundamental quality objectives <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>in</strong>ventory- transparency, completeness, consistency, comparability, <strong>and</strong> accuracy. There are significant<br />

opportunities for the United States <strong>and</strong> many other nations that have facility-level report<strong>in</strong>g programs to improve their<br />

national <strong>in</strong>ventories, as long as the <strong>in</strong>corporation <strong>of</strong> that data is done <strong>in</strong> a deliberative manner with an eye to these<br />

quality objectives.<br />

Background<br />

The United States <strong>and</strong> other developed countries agreed to submit greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reports annually<br />

when they signed the Climate Treaty <strong>in</strong> June 1992 at the Rio Earth Summit. The United States has submitted the<br />

Inventory <strong>of</strong> U.S. <strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> (GHG) Emissions <strong>and</strong> S<strong>in</strong>ks (the U.S. GHG Inventory) to the Secretariat <strong>of</strong> the United<br />

Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) on an annual basis s<strong>in</strong>ce 1993. Over the years,<br />

methods used by the United States to develop the U.S. GHG Inventory have evolved as the <strong>in</strong>ternational guidel<strong>in</strong>es have<br />

advanced <strong>and</strong> as new <strong>and</strong> better data sources become available to support Inventory development. The United States<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ually strives to improve the national Inventory <strong>and</strong> present the most accurate GHG emissions estimates for both<br />

the entire time series <strong>and</strong> the most recent year for which data are available. This means, as methods evolve <strong>and</strong> new<br />

data sources become available, we are very m<strong>in</strong>dful <strong>of</strong> the IPCC quality objectives <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g the Inventory:<br />

transparency, accuracy, consistency, comparability, <strong>and</strong> completeness 14 .<br />

Transparency: There is sufficient <strong>and</strong> clear documentation such that <strong>in</strong>dividuals or groups other than <strong>in</strong>ventory<br />

compilers can underst<strong>and</strong> how the <strong>in</strong>ventory was compiled <strong>and</strong> can be assured it meets the good practice<br />

requirements for national greenhouse gas emissions <strong>in</strong>ventories.<br />

Completeness: Estimates are reported for all relevant categories <strong>of</strong> sources <strong>and</strong> s<strong>in</strong>ks, <strong>and</strong> gases.<br />

Consistency: Estimates for different <strong>in</strong>ventory years, gases <strong>and</strong> categories are made <strong>in</strong> such a way that<br />

differences <strong>in</strong> the results between years <strong>and</strong> categories reflect real differences <strong>in</strong> emissions. Inventory annual<br />

trends, as far as possible, should be calculated us<strong>in</strong>g the same method <strong>and</strong> data sources <strong>in</strong> all years <strong>and</strong><br />

should aim to reflect the real annual fluctuations <strong>in</strong> emissions or removals <strong>and</strong> not be subject to changes<br />

result<strong>in</strong>g from methodological differences.<br />

Comparability: The national greenhouse gas <strong>in</strong>ventory is reported <strong>in</strong> a way that allows it to be compared with<br />

national greenhouse gas <strong>in</strong>ventories for other countries.<br />

14<br />

2006 IPCC Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for National <strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> <strong>Inventories</strong>. Edited by Simon Eggelston, Le<strong>and</strong>ro Buendia, Kyoko Miwa,<br />

Todd Ngara, Kiyoto Tanabe. Published by the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES) for the IPCC ISBN 4-88788-032-4<br />

IPCC Expert Meet<strong>in</strong>g Report 110 TFI

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!