School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University
School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University
School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
DISCUSSION<br />
Figure 1: A rather simplified food web <strong>of</strong> the North Sea (after Sommer, 2005).<br />
A microzooplankton diet transfers not only energy but also minerals, vitamins, amino<br />
acids, fatty acids <strong>and</strong> sterols from lower trophic levels, thus balancing any nutritional<br />
shortfalls <strong>of</strong> herbivory by “trophic upgrading” (Klein Breteler et al., 1999, Tang & Taal,<br />
2005). Such shortfalls occur frequently during nutrient-limiting conditions for<br />
phytoplankton in an ongoing bloom (Malzahn et al., 2010). These facts support my<br />
finding that during the course <strong>of</strong> the phytoplankton bloom microzooplankton became<br />
even more dominant in the diet <strong>of</strong> the copepods than phytoplankton, although<br />
autotrophic prey was available in much higher concentrations. The reproductive success<br />
in copepods can be directly enhanced by the availability <strong>of</strong> nutritionally “better”<br />
microzooplankton prey (Tang & Taal, 2005). Copepods in turn are themselves an<br />
important diet <strong>of</strong> fish larvae <strong>and</strong> the availability <strong>of</strong> this food source is crucial for their<br />
survival (Castonguay et al., 2008). The availability <strong>of</strong> microzooplankton prey can thus<br />
potentially influence fish abundances. More recent studies suggest that<br />
microzooplankton is also important prey for fish larvae, thereby directly influencing<br />
fish abundance (Montagnes et al., 2010).<br />
132