11.03.2014 Views

School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University

School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University

School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER III<br />

General development <strong>of</strong> the spring bloom<br />

Starting with 44 µgC L -1 phytoplankton biomass, the spring bloom evolved immediately<br />

<strong>and</strong> reached its maximum at 269 µgC L -1 within the first eight days <strong>of</strong> the experiment<br />

(24.03.09) (Figure 1). At this exponential phase phytoplankton had a maximal net<br />

growth rate <strong>of</strong> 0.48 d -1 (18.-20.03.09) <strong>and</strong> a mean net growth rate <strong>of</strong> 0.23 d -1 (16.-<br />

24.03.09). During the following three weeks the biomass decreased at a mean rate <strong>of</strong> -<br />

0.05 d -1 to a final value <strong>of</strong> 84 µgC L -1 .<br />

Microzooplankton, starting with 14 µgC L -1 , followed the phytoplankton bloom with a<br />

delay <strong>of</strong> roughly a week <strong>and</strong> peaked on the 30.03.09 with 124 µgC L -1 (Figure 1).<br />

Microzooplankton reached growth rates <strong>of</strong> up to 0.27 d -1 (23.-24.03.09) but grew at a<br />

mean rate <strong>of</strong> 0.16 d -1 . Until the end <strong>of</strong> the experiment microzooplankton biomass<br />

decreased at a mean rate <strong>of</strong> -0.15 d -1 to 12 µgC L -1 , i.e. close to the starting value.<br />

Phytoplankton composition<br />

The spring bloom was dominated by diatoms <strong>and</strong> small flagellates (five size classes <strong>of</strong> 5<br />

– 25 µm length) see Figure 3a+b. While flagellates contributed 34% to phytoplankton<br />

biomass at the start they played only a minor role during the bloom phase. The bloom<br />

itself was dominated by diatoms (96%) <strong>of</strong> the genera Chaetoceros (C. danicus <strong>and</strong> other<br />

Chaetoceros spp. <strong>of</strong> different size classes), Thalassiosira (T. rotula <strong>and</strong> T.<br />

nordernskjoeldii) <strong>and</strong> Rhizosolenia (R. stylisformis/hebetata group <strong>and</strong> R. pungens),<br />

each genus contributing roughly one third. In the later bloom phase Thalassiosira<br />

became more dominant <strong>and</strong> represented up to 49% <strong>of</strong> the phytoplankton carbon. The<br />

category ‘other diatoms’ (Pseudonitzschia spp., Navicula spp., Asterionellopsis<br />

glacialis <strong>and</strong> others) contributed only 1-4% to the phytoplankton biomass. Flagellate<br />

biomass peaked four days earlier than the diatoms <strong>and</strong> showed a steeper decline. Along<br />

with decreasing diatom shares, it increased again to around 20% <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

phytoplankton carbon in the last week <strong>of</strong> the experiment.<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!