11.03.2014 Views

School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University

School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University

School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER III<br />

µgC prey µgC predator -1 d -1 ) was the lowest detected in our experiments leading to a<br />

total daily ingestion I <strong>of</strong> 58.02 µgC L -1 d -1 (Table 2). Microzooplankton selected for<br />

flagellates (except flagellates 5 µm), Rhizosolenia spp. <strong>and</strong> Chaetoceros spp. (Table 2).<br />

In the late post-bloom phase (Experiment 4), grazer biomass (33 µgC L -1 ) was as low as<br />

before the bloom <strong>and</strong> again saturated feeding was detected in 5 phytoplankton species<br />

(Appendix Table 1). Beside the now dominating din<strong>of</strong>lagellates, rotifers became as<br />

important as ciliates. The community grazed 48% <strong>of</strong> P i <strong>and</strong> 80% <strong>of</strong> P p at a rate <strong>of</strong> 0.39<br />

d -1 (g) <strong>and</strong> filtered 0.39 L d -1 (F) (Table 1+2). I c (0.97 µgC prey µgC predator -1 d -1 )<br />

increased to a value similar to Experiment 2 resulting in a total daily ingestion I <strong>of</strong><br />

32.13 µgC L -1 d -1 . Again instantaneous growth µ 0 (0.52 d -1 ) <strong>of</strong> the phytoplankton<br />

exceeded the growth in fertilized bottles (0.41 d -1 ) (Table 1). Selectivity was similar to<br />

Experiment 1 whereas also the category ‘other diatoms’ was selected.<br />

Microzooplankton predator-prey relationships<br />

A direct coupling between ciliate <strong>and</strong> flagellate biomass was observed. This resulted in<br />

a strong suppression <strong>of</strong> flagellate biomass from 26 to 10 µgC coincident with the ciliate<br />

peak (Figure 6a). This was most pronounced for thecate <strong>and</strong> athecate din<strong>of</strong>lagellates <<br />

15 µm which disappeared totally during the Strombidium capitatum bloom (Figure 6b).<br />

Simultaneously with the disappearance <strong>of</strong> both din<strong>of</strong>lagellate groups S. capitatum<br />

started to form cysts <strong>and</strong> its population collapsed totally within one week. With the<br />

break-down <strong>of</strong> strombidiid <strong>and</strong> strobilid biomass at the end <strong>of</strong> March a relaxation from<br />

grazing pressure enabled the flagellates to regenerate again.<br />

The majority <strong>of</strong> din<strong>of</strong>lagellate species we found in the mesocosms are reported to prefer<br />

diatom prey. As diatoms did hardly change in composition, din<strong>of</strong>lagellate succession in<br />

the mesocosms was not as pronounced as for the ciliates. While two groups disappeared<br />

during the first half <strong>of</strong> our experiment due to predation by ciliates as described above,<br />

the remaining din<strong>of</strong>lagellate community composition remained relatively constant until<br />

the end <strong>of</strong> the experiment.<br />

We also found a strong predator-prey relationship between a thecate amoeba <strong>and</strong><br />

Chaetoceros spp.. The apparently parasitic amoeba was found to be attached only to<br />

cells <strong>of</strong> this genus. The abundance <strong>of</strong> the amoeba followed the development <strong>of</strong><br />

Chaetoceros spp. <strong>and</strong> showed a similar decline towards the end <strong>of</strong> the experiment.<br />

81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!