School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University
School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University
School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER III<br />
µgC prey µgC predator -1 d -1 ) was the lowest detected in our experiments leading to a<br />
total daily ingestion I <strong>of</strong> 58.02 µgC L -1 d -1 (Table 2). Microzooplankton selected for<br />
flagellates (except flagellates 5 µm), Rhizosolenia spp. <strong>and</strong> Chaetoceros spp. (Table 2).<br />
In the late post-bloom phase (Experiment 4), grazer biomass (33 µgC L -1 ) was as low as<br />
before the bloom <strong>and</strong> again saturated feeding was detected in 5 phytoplankton species<br />
(Appendix Table 1). Beside the now dominating din<strong>of</strong>lagellates, rotifers became as<br />
important as ciliates. The community grazed 48% <strong>of</strong> P i <strong>and</strong> 80% <strong>of</strong> P p at a rate <strong>of</strong> 0.39<br />
d -1 (g) <strong>and</strong> filtered 0.39 L d -1 (F) (Table 1+2). I c (0.97 µgC prey µgC predator -1 d -1 )<br />
increased to a value similar to Experiment 2 resulting in a total daily ingestion I <strong>of</strong><br />
32.13 µgC L -1 d -1 . Again instantaneous growth µ 0 (0.52 d -1 ) <strong>of</strong> the phytoplankton<br />
exceeded the growth in fertilized bottles (0.41 d -1 ) (Table 1). Selectivity was similar to<br />
Experiment 1 whereas also the category ‘other diatoms’ was selected.<br />
Microzooplankton predator-prey relationships<br />
A direct coupling between ciliate <strong>and</strong> flagellate biomass was observed. This resulted in<br />
a strong suppression <strong>of</strong> flagellate biomass from 26 to 10 µgC coincident with the ciliate<br />
peak (Figure 6a). This was most pronounced for thecate <strong>and</strong> athecate din<strong>of</strong>lagellates <<br />
15 µm which disappeared totally during the Strombidium capitatum bloom (Figure 6b).<br />
Simultaneously with the disappearance <strong>of</strong> both din<strong>of</strong>lagellate groups S. capitatum<br />
started to form cysts <strong>and</strong> its population collapsed totally within one week. With the<br />
break-down <strong>of</strong> strombidiid <strong>and</strong> strobilid biomass at the end <strong>of</strong> March a relaxation from<br />
grazing pressure enabled the flagellates to regenerate again.<br />
The majority <strong>of</strong> din<strong>of</strong>lagellate species we found in the mesocosms are reported to prefer<br />
diatom prey. As diatoms did hardly change in composition, din<strong>of</strong>lagellate succession in<br />
the mesocosms was not as pronounced as for the ciliates. While two groups disappeared<br />
during the first half <strong>of</strong> our experiment due to predation by ciliates as described above,<br />
the remaining din<strong>of</strong>lagellate community composition remained relatively constant until<br />
the end <strong>of</strong> the experiment.<br />
We also found a strong predator-prey relationship between a thecate amoeba <strong>and</strong><br />
Chaetoceros spp.. The apparently parasitic amoeba was found to be attached only to<br />
cells <strong>of</strong> this genus. The abundance <strong>of</strong> the amoeba followed the development <strong>of</strong><br />
Chaetoceros spp. <strong>and</strong> showed a similar decline towards the end <strong>of</strong> the experiment.<br />
81