11.03.2014 Views

School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University

School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University

School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER I<br />

Microzooplankton can be both prey <strong>and</strong> competitor for mesozooplankton. At Helgol<strong>and</strong><br />

Roads small calanoid copepods can be regarded as direct competitors <strong>of</strong> ciliates <strong>and</strong><br />

din<strong>of</strong>lagellates for phytoplankton food. Their concentration ranges between 2 <strong>and</strong> 10<br />

individuals L -1 throughout the year with highest values during the summer period<br />

(Greve et al., 2004).<br />

The mean carbon content (annual mean 2007, n = 45) <strong>of</strong> the abundant small calanoid<br />

copepod Temora longicornis (Greve et al., 2004) was 9.5 µg carbon female -1 (K. L.<br />

Schoo, unpublished) at Helgol<strong>and</strong> Roads. Assuming a maximum carbon content <strong>of</strong> 10<br />

µg per copepod combined with the maximum concentrations given by Greve et al.<br />

(2004) would therefore result in maximum copepod carbon biomass <strong>of</strong> 100 µg L -1<br />

(June/July). These values were surpassed by microzooplankton biomass, especially<br />

during the spring bloom. At this time the combined effects <strong>of</strong> a faster metabolism <strong>and</strong><br />

higher productivity (Fenchel & Finlay, 1983, Montagnes & Lessard, 1999) allowed<br />

microzooplankton an undelayed direct response to an increase in prey availability<br />

(Johansson et al., 2004, Aberle et al., 2007) compared to its copepod competitors.<br />

Therefore, it is hardly surprising that recent studies have shown that microzooplankton<br />

competes not only for the same resources with copepods (Aberle et al., 2007) but may<br />

exert a stronger grazing pressure on phytoplankton than copepods (Sherr & Sherr, 2007)<br />

especially during bloom events. Our results confirm such a pivotal role <strong>of</strong><br />

microzooplankton as phytoplankton grazers at Helgol<strong>and</strong> Roads.<br />

We found that during the summer months ciliate biomass was generally lower when<br />

compared with din<strong>of</strong>lagellate biomass <strong>and</strong> only with their decreasing concentrations at<br />

the end <strong>of</strong> summer ciliate biomass gained the same importance as din<strong>of</strong>lagellate<br />

biomass again. Ciliates are, however, the first microzooplankton grazers which react to<br />

enhanced food availability in spring when the concentration <strong>of</strong> small flagellated prey<br />

increases at Helgol<strong>and</strong>. Such an earlier onset <strong>of</strong> ciliate blooms can be directly linked to<br />

their higher metabolic rates <strong>and</strong> growth rates when compared to din<strong>of</strong>lagellates<br />

(Hansen, 1992, Strom & Morello, 1998). On the other h<strong>and</strong> they are generally more<br />

restricted to the availability <strong>of</strong> particular prey types (Tillmann, 2004), especially<br />

flagellates, than din<strong>of</strong>lagellates are (Jeong, 1999). Thus, ciliates can respond more<br />

rapidly than din<strong>of</strong>lagellate to enhanced food concentrations but their potential for<br />

surviving starvation periods is low (Jackson & Berger, 1985) compared to<br />

din<strong>of</strong>lagellates (Hansen, 1992, Menden-Deuer et al., 2005). This implies rapid<br />

responses to increasing food concentrations but also quick declines <strong>of</strong> ciliate<br />

concentrations as a direct response to decreasing prey concentrations. Ciliate maxima<br />

34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!