11.03.2014 Views

School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University

School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University

School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER III<br />

filtering with a combination <strong>of</strong> 3 µm GFF + 0.2 µm membrane filter. The water was<br />

stored sterile <strong>and</strong> dark in the thermo-constant room together with the mesocosms.<br />

Particle-freeness was proved via flow-cytometry (FACSCalibur, Becton & Dickinson)<br />

before each experiment started. Four exact dilutions <strong>of</strong> 10, 25, 50 <strong>and</strong> 100% <strong>of</strong><br />

undiluted seawater from each mesocosm were prepared. For the incubation three 2.3 L<br />

polycarbonate bottles were gently filled with water from each dilution. The Funnel-<br />

Transfer-Technique appropriate for ciliates (Löder et al., 2010) was used for filling<br />

purposes as these organisms are very sensitive to destruction by vigorous filling <strong>and</strong><br />

mixing procedures (L<strong>and</strong>ry, 1993).<br />

To prevent nutrient limitation biases during the phytoplankton bloom sterile filtered<br />

nutrient solutions (F/2 medium, Guillard & Ryther (1962)) were added to the dilution<br />

series (8 x 10 -4 mNO 3 , 1.3 x 10 -5 mPO 4 <strong>and</strong> 2.4 x 10 -5 mSiO 2 , Experiment 1+2 no SiO 2 ).<br />

One control bottle per mesocosm was incubated without the addition <strong>of</strong> nutrients.<br />

Copepod grazing set up<br />

The most reliable method to quantify feeding rates <strong>of</strong> mesozooplankton on both<br />

phytoplankton <strong>and</strong> non-pigmented microzooplankton, is the analysis <strong>of</strong> particle removal<br />

in bottle incubations (Båmstedt et al., 2000). Because <strong>of</strong> interferences with<br />

microzooplankton grazing activity, especially when both micro- <strong>and</strong> mesozooplankton<br />

prey upon the same species, it is necessary to simultaneously estimate the<br />

microzooplankton grazing rates in separate dilution experiments (Nejstgaard et al.,<br />

1997, Nejstgaard et al., 2001). Thus, for copepod grazing experiments three 2.3 L<br />

bottles per mesocosm (100% undiluted water with added nutrients) were prepared along<br />

with the dilutions <strong>and</strong> 25 female copepods <strong>of</strong> the species Temora longicornis were<br />

added to each bottle (~11 copepod L -1 ). This copepod concentration was at the upper<br />

limit <strong>of</strong> in situ densities in the period March-April (Greve et al., 2004). T. longicornis is<br />

known to be a selective <strong>and</strong> omnivorous grazer feeding on phytoplankton <strong>and</strong><br />

microzooplankton in size classes > 20 µm (Tackx et al., 1990, Maar et al., 2004,<br />

Gentsch et al., 2009). Its role in the planktonic food web makes T. longicornis a key<br />

species <strong>and</strong> therefore it was selected as copepod grazer in our experiment. These<br />

copepods were caught by vertical net hauls at Helgol<strong>and</strong> Roads <strong>and</strong> transferred to the<br />

laboratory immediately. Only actively swimming females <strong>of</strong> T. longicornis were sorted<br />

out under a dissecting microscope <strong>and</strong> acclimated to mesocosm conditions for 24 hours<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!