School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University
School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University
School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER III<br />
filtering with a combination <strong>of</strong> 3 µm GFF + 0.2 µm membrane filter. The water was<br />
stored sterile <strong>and</strong> dark in the thermo-constant room together with the mesocosms.<br />
Particle-freeness was proved via flow-cytometry (FACSCalibur, Becton & Dickinson)<br />
before each experiment started. Four exact dilutions <strong>of</strong> 10, 25, 50 <strong>and</strong> 100% <strong>of</strong><br />
undiluted seawater from each mesocosm were prepared. For the incubation three 2.3 L<br />
polycarbonate bottles were gently filled with water from each dilution. The Funnel-<br />
Transfer-Technique appropriate for ciliates (Löder et al., 2010) was used for filling<br />
purposes as these organisms are very sensitive to destruction by vigorous filling <strong>and</strong><br />
mixing procedures (L<strong>and</strong>ry, 1993).<br />
To prevent nutrient limitation biases during the phytoplankton bloom sterile filtered<br />
nutrient solutions (F/2 medium, Guillard & Ryther (1962)) were added to the dilution<br />
series (8 x 10 -4 mNO 3 , 1.3 x 10 -5 mPO 4 <strong>and</strong> 2.4 x 10 -5 mSiO 2 , Experiment 1+2 no SiO 2 ).<br />
One control bottle per mesocosm was incubated without the addition <strong>of</strong> nutrients.<br />
Copepod grazing set up<br />
The most reliable method to quantify feeding rates <strong>of</strong> mesozooplankton on both<br />
phytoplankton <strong>and</strong> non-pigmented microzooplankton, is the analysis <strong>of</strong> particle removal<br />
in bottle incubations (Båmstedt et al., 2000). Because <strong>of</strong> interferences with<br />
microzooplankton grazing activity, especially when both micro- <strong>and</strong> mesozooplankton<br />
prey upon the same species, it is necessary to simultaneously estimate the<br />
microzooplankton grazing rates in separate dilution experiments (Nejstgaard et al.,<br />
1997, Nejstgaard et al., 2001). Thus, for copepod grazing experiments three 2.3 L<br />
bottles per mesocosm (100% undiluted water with added nutrients) were prepared along<br />
with the dilutions <strong>and</strong> 25 female copepods <strong>of</strong> the species Temora longicornis were<br />
added to each bottle (~11 copepod L -1 ). This copepod concentration was at the upper<br />
limit <strong>of</strong> in situ densities in the period March-April (Greve et al., 2004). T. longicornis is<br />
known to be a selective <strong>and</strong> omnivorous grazer feeding on phytoplankton <strong>and</strong><br />
microzooplankton in size classes > 20 µm (Tackx et al., 1990, Maar et al., 2004,<br />
Gentsch et al., 2009). Its role in the planktonic food web makes T. longicornis a key<br />
species <strong>and</strong> therefore it was selected as copepod grazer in our experiment. These<br />
copepods were caught by vertical net hauls at Helgol<strong>and</strong> Roads <strong>and</strong> transferred to the<br />
laboratory immediately. Only actively swimming females <strong>of</strong> T. longicornis were sorted<br />
out under a dissecting microscope <strong>and</strong> acclimated to mesocosm conditions for 24 hours<br />
67