School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University
School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University
School of Engineering and Science - Jacobs University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER III<br />
Microzooplankton<br />
Experiment 1 - (MMC 30.33 µg L -1 )<br />
Experiment 2 - (MMC 74.47 µg L -1 )<br />
Phytoplankton F c p I c p E* F c p I c p E*<br />
Chaetoceros spp. 1.99E-08 * 0.30 * 0.30 1.70E-08 **** 0.16 **** 0.24<br />
Rhizosolenia spp. 9.11E-09 ** 0.33 ** -0.08 1.02E-08 **** 0.41 **** -0.01<br />
Thalassiosira spp. 1.85E-08 ** 0.73 ** 0.26 8.46E-09 **** 0.35 **** -0.11<br />
Flagellates 6.35E-09 ** 0.10 ** -0.26 1.13E-08 * 0.11 * 0.04<br />
other Diatoms -3.46E-09 * -0.02 * -1.00 5.49E-09 ** 0.03 ** -0.31<br />
TOTAL PHYTOPLANKTON 1.40E-08 * 1.57 * 8.85E-09 *** 1.00 ***<br />
RELATED TO TOTAL<br />
MICROZOOPLANKTON CARBON<br />
F 0.425 I 47.65 F 0.659 I 74.58<br />
Experiment 3 - (MMC 93.82 µg L -1 ) Experiment 4 - (MMC 33.12 µg L -1 )<br />
Phytoplankton F c p I c p E* F c p I c p E*<br />
Chaetoceros spp. 5.53E-09 * 0.08 * 0.13 2.12E-08 **** 0.17 **** 0.13<br />
Rhizosolenia spp. 4.48E-09 **** 0.16 **** 0.03 1.49E-08 **** 0.39 **** -0.04<br />
Thalassiosira spp. 1.59E-09 * 0.08 * -0.46 2.09E-08 **** 0.49 **** 0.13<br />
Flagellates 5.68E-09 *** 0.09 *** 0.14 2.92E-09 0.06 -0.70<br />
other Diatoms 3.98E-09 * 0.01 * -0.03 2.14E-08 **** 0.02 **** 0.14<br />
TOTAL PHYTOPLANKTON 5.77E-09 **** 0.62 **** 1.19E-08 *** 0.97 ***<br />
RELATED TO TOTAL<br />
MICROZOOPLANKTON CARBON<br />
F 0.542 I 58.02 F 0.394 I 32.13<br />
Table 2: Microzooplankton carbon specific filtration rates F c [L µgC predator -1 d -1 ] <strong>and</strong> carbon specific<br />
ingestion rates I c [µgC prey µgC predator -1 d -1 ], total filtration rates F [L d -1 ], total ingestion rates I [µgC<br />
prey L -1 d -1 ] <strong>and</strong> electivity E* [-] for different phytoplankton groups. Positive selection marked with gray<br />
background. MMC = mean microzooplankton carbon biomass. P-values are the same as for the grazing<br />
rates <strong>of</strong> microzooplankton. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.<br />
At the phytoplankton peak (Experiment 2) total grazer biomass (74 µgC L -1 ) was more<br />
than twice as high as during the pre-bloom experiment <strong>and</strong> shares <strong>of</strong> din<strong>of</strong>lagellate <strong>and</strong><br />
ciliate biomass were almost equal. Ciliates displayed the highest growth rates <strong>of</strong> 0.37 d -1<br />
in this phase. The community showed an I c <strong>of</strong> 1.00 µgC prey µgC predator -1 d -1 at a total<br />
filtration rate F <strong>of</strong> 0.66 L d -1 (Table 2) <strong>and</strong> a total grazing rate g <strong>of</strong> 0.66 d -1 (Table 1). As<br />
µ 0 (0.77 d -1 ) was higher than g 93% <strong>of</strong> P i <strong>and</strong> 90% <strong>of</strong> P p (Table 1) were grazed. Food<br />
selectivity reflected the high grazer diversity <strong>and</strong> was spread over all categories <strong>of</strong><br />
phytoplankton resulting in a total daily ingestion <strong>of</strong> 74.58 µgC L -1 d -1 (Table 2). On<br />
group level microzooplankton selected flagellates <strong>and</strong> Thalassiosira spp. (Table 2).<br />
The early post bloom phase (Experiment 3) was characterized by the highest grazer<br />
biomass <strong>of</strong> all experiments (94 µgC L -1 ) <strong>and</strong> ciliates clearly dominated the community<br />
(69%). Microzooplankton grazed 72% <strong>of</strong> P i <strong>and</strong> 87% <strong>of</strong> P p at a rate <strong>of</strong> 0.54 d -1 (g) <strong>and</strong><br />
filtered 0.54 L d -1 (F) (Table 1+2). Phytoplankton displayed a higher instantaneous<br />
growth rate µ 0 (0.65 d -1 ) than in the fertilized incubation bottles (k = 0.39 d -1 ). I c (0.62<br />
80