12.05.2014 Views

PRA-Manual Embracing Participitation tools-only.pdf - PACA

PRA-Manual Embracing Participitation tools-only.pdf - PACA

PRA-Manual Embracing Participitation tools-only.pdf - PACA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EMBRACING PARTICIPATION IN DEVELOPMENT: Wisdom from the Field 3.9<br />

1.7 Composition of the facilitating team<br />

Participatory appraisals are best facilitated by teams of three to four members.<br />

In case the team size is more than five, it is best to sub-divide the team in<br />

smaller groups. In any case, care must be taken that the facilitators do not<br />

outnumber the participating community members.<br />

It is important that the team of facilitators includes some members from the<br />

community (i.e. local residents), partner organizations (e.g., clinics, MOH, etc.)<br />

and other local NGOs. Having local residents on the team increases the acceptance<br />

of the process by the community, and provides a practical approach to<br />

generating durable and meaningful partnerships with communities and partner<br />

agencies. This way the ownership of the process, and subsequently the Project,<br />

is well shared with the community. During participatory appraisals with adolescents<br />

in Zambia the facilitating teams included clinicians, members of the<br />

Neighborhood Health Committees (NHCs) comprising of local residents, and<br />

representatives from other NGOs.<br />

A good gender balance within the facilitating team is recommended. In<br />

general, mixed teams of facilitators function well in the field. However, for<br />

facilitating analysis on sensitive subjects, it may be necessary to have a separate<br />

group of female facilitators interacting with female, and male facilitators with<br />

the male community members. During the PALS appraisals we used both,<br />

gender – segregated as well as mixed teams of facilitators. While the female<br />

facilitators did not have any problems in interacting with girls or boys, some of<br />

the male facilitators found it difficult to facilitate discussions on sensitive and<br />

personal subjects with the girls.<br />

The facilitators were having separate semi-structured interviews with<br />

some adolescents in Kanyama Compound when a girl approached<br />

the older looking female facilitator. The girl mentioned that she<br />

had already had a discussion with another (much younger) female<br />

facilitator but had not told her everything. Making her feel<br />

comfortable, the facilitator started a discussion with the girl. The girl<br />

informed that she had not been able to tell the other facilitator<br />

that she had been gang raped some time ago.<br />

Part 3<br />

After a long one-to-one discussion, the girl told the facilitator that<br />

she had felt much more comfortable because she had shared her<br />

story with her.<br />

From the field notes of Betty Muleya, Old Kanyama Compound, Lusaka, Zambia<br />

There are other characteristics that should be considered when composing a<br />

facilitation team. Age can be a sensitive factor, especially when facilitating<br />

discussions on reproductive health with older men and women. In other<br />

settings, ethnicity and language groups might be important characteristics.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!