PRA-Manual Embracing Participitation tools-only.pdf - PACA
PRA-Manual Embracing Participitation tools-only.pdf - PACA
PRA-Manual Embracing Participitation tools-only.pdf - PACA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
EMBRACING PARTICIPATION IN DEVELOPMENT: Wisdom from the Field 3.9<br />
1.7 Composition of the facilitating team<br />
Participatory appraisals are best facilitated by teams of three to four members.<br />
In case the team size is more than five, it is best to sub-divide the team in<br />
smaller groups. In any case, care must be taken that the facilitators do not<br />
outnumber the participating community members.<br />
It is important that the team of facilitators includes some members from the<br />
community (i.e. local residents), partner organizations (e.g., clinics, MOH, etc.)<br />
and other local NGOs. Having local residents on the team increases the acceptance<br />
of the process by the community, and provides a practical approach to<br />
generating durable and meaningful partnerships with communities and partner<br />
agencies. This way the ownership of the process, and subsequently the Project,<br />
is well shared with the community. During participatory appraisals with adolescents<br />
in Zambia the facilitating teams included clinicians, members of the<br />
Neighborhood Health Committees (NHCs) comprising of local residents, and<br />
representatives from other NGOs.<br />
A good gender balance within the facilitating team is recommended. In<br />
general, mixed teams of facilitators function well in the field. However, for<br />
facilitating analysis on sensitive subjects, it may be necessary to have a separate<br />
group of female facilitators interacting with female, and male facilitators with<br />
the male community members. During the PALS appraisals we used both,<br />
gender – segregated as well as mixed teams of facilitators. While the female<br />
facilitators did not have any problems in interacting with girls or boys, some of<br />
the male facilitators found it difficult to facilitate discussions on sensitive and<br />
personal subjects with the girls.<br />
The facilitators were having separate semi-structured interviews with<br />
some adolescents in Kanyama Compound when a girl approached<br />
the older looking female facilitator. The girl mentioned that she<br />
had already had a discussion with another (much younger) female<br />
facilitator but had not told her everything. Making her feel<br />
comfortable, the facilitator started a discussion with the girl. The girl<br />
informed that she had not been able to tell the other facilitator<br />
that she had been gang raped some time ago.<br />
Part 3<br />
After a long one-to-one discussion, the girl told the facilitator that<br />
she had felt much more comfortable because she had shared her<br />
story with her.<br />
From the field notes of Betty Muleya, Old Kanyama Compound, Lusaka, Zambia<br />
There are other characteristics that should be considered when composing a<br />
facilitation team. Age can be a sensitive factor, especially when facilitating<br />
discussions on reproductive health with older men and women. In other<br />
settings, ethnicity and language groups might be important characteristics.