12.05.2014 Views

PRA-Manual Embracing Participitation tools-only.pdf - PACA

PRA-Manual Embracing Participitation tools-only.pdf - PACA

PRA-Manual Embracing Participitation tools-only.pdf - PACA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.2 EMBRACING PARTICIPATION IN DEVELOPMENT: Wisdom from the Field<br />

These led to the search for less costly and more rapid methods of data collection<br />

by development professionals. While many methods and techniques used in<br />

<strong>PRA</strong> are the same as used in RRA, there is a fundamental difference between<br />

them. While in RRA it was the outsider professional who applied and<br />

controlled the use of these methods for data collection, <strong>PRA</strong> enables the local<br />

community to use these methods themselves for analyzing their situation and<br />

preparing their own plans. The shift has been from ‘extracting’ information to<br />

enabling the community to take over the process of analyzing their conditions,<br />

and planning and implementation of development activities.<br />

The label <strong>PRA</strong> continues to be more comm<strong>only</strong> used in the growing literature<br />

on the subject. However, in recent years it is increasingly felt that the term is<br />

too restrictive with its accent on ‘rural’ and ‘appraisal’. This methodology does<br />

have its roots in the field of rural development, but during the past three to four<br />

years it has been adapted for use in urban areas as well, where it continues to<br />

spread in new fields. It is also felt that the word ‘appraisal’ indicates a false limit<br />

to the use of the methodology in the subsequent stages of the project cycle.<br />

Participatory Learning and Action (PLA), in comparison, is a more appropriate<br />

label for the methodology in its present form. ‘PLA’ is applicable to rural and<br />

urban contexts, and indicates its continued use during the ‘action’, or implementation<br />

phases of the project cycle.<br />

1.2 Key principles of PLA<br />

Chambers (1997: 156-157)) describes the following key principles of PLA (10) .<br />

Part 3<br />

The facilitator takes a back seat and allows the participants<br />

to carryout their analysis without interruption. Zambia<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

A reversal of learning: Learn directly from the local community,<br />

gaining from their local physical, technical and social knowledge.<br />

Learning rapidly and progressively: Learn with conscious exploration,<br />

flexible use of methods, maximizing opportunities, improvisation, iteration,<br />

and cross-checking, not following a blueprint program but being<br />

adaptable in a learning process.<br />

Offsetting biases: Offset biases, especially those of rural development<br />

tourism, by being relaxed and not rushing, listening not lecturing,<br />

probing instead of passing on to the next topic, being unimposing, and<br />

seeking out marginalized groups within the community (the poorer<br />

people, minorities, children and women) and learning their<br />

concerns and priorities.<br />

Optimizing trade-offs: Relate the costs of learning to the useful<br />

truth of information, with trade-offs between quantity, relevance,<br />

accuracy and timeliness. This includes the principles of optimal<br />

ignorance – not learning more than necessary, and of appropriate<br />

imprecision – not measuring what need not be measured, or<br />

measuring more accurately than needed.<br />

Triangulating: Learn from several (often three) methods, disciplines,<br />

individuals or groups, locations and/or types of information,<br />

to cross-check, compare and verify. Verification also involves

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!