PRA-Manual Embracing Participitation tools-only.pdf - PACA
PRA-Manual Embracing Participitation tools-only.pdf - PACA
PRA-Manual Embracing Participitation tools-only.pdf - PACA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3.2 EMBRACING PARTICIPATION IN DEVELOPMENT: Wisdom from the Field<br />
These led to the search for less costly and more rapid methods of data collection<br />
by development professionals. While many methods and techniques used in<br />
<strong>PRA</strong> are the same as used in RRA, there is a fundamental difference between<br />
them. While in RRA it was the outsider professional who applied and<br />
controlled the use of these methods for data collection, <strong>PRA</strong> enables the local<br />
community to use these methods themselves for analyzing their situation and<br />
preparing their own plans. The shift has been from ‘extracting’ information to<br />
enabling the community to take over the process of analyzing their conditions,<br />
and planning and implementation of development activities.<br />
The label <strong>PRA</strong> continues to be more comm<strong>only</strong> used in the growing literature<br />
on the subject. However, in recent years it is increasingly felt that the term is<br />
too restrictive with its accent on ‘rural’ and ‘appraisal’. This methodology does<br />
have its roots in the field of rural development, but during the past three to four<br />
years it has been adapted for use in urban areas as well, where it continues to<br />
spread in new fields. It is also felt that the word ‘appraisal’ indicates a false limit<br />
to the use of the methodology in the subsequent stages of the project cycle.<br />
Participatory Learning and Action (PLA), in comparison, is a more appropriate<br />
label for the methodology in its present form. ‘PLA’ is applicable to rural and<br />
urban contexts, and indicates its continued use during the ‘action’, or implementation<br />
phases of the project cycle.<br />
1.2 Key principles of PLA<br />
Chambers (1997: 156-157)) describes the following key principles of PLA (10) .<br />
Part 3<br />
The facilitator takes a back seat and allows the participants<br />
to carryout their analysis without interruption. Zambia<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
A reversal of learning: Learn directly from the local community,<br />
gaining from their local physical, technical and social knowledge.<br />
Learning rapidly and progressively: Learn with conscious exploration,<br />
flexible use of methods, maximizing opportunities, improvisation, iteration,<br />
and cross-checking, not following a blueprint program but being<br />
adaptable in a learning process.<br />
Offsetting biases: Offset biases, especially those of rural development<br />
tourism, by being relaxed and not rushing, listening not lecturing,<br />
probing instead of passing on to the next topic, being unimposing, and<br />
seeking out marginalized groups within the community (the poorer<br />
people, minorities, children and women) and learning their<br />
concerns and priorities.<br />
Optimizing trade-offs: Relate the costs of learning to the useful<br />
truth of information, with trade-offs between quantity, relevance,<br />
accuracy and timeliness. This includes the principles of optimal<br />
ignorance – not learning more than necessary, and of appropriate<br />
imprecision – not measuring what need not be measured, or<br />
measuring more accurately than needed.<br />
Triangulating: Learn from several (often three) methods, disciplines,<br />
individuals or groups, locations and/or types of information,<br />
to cross-check, compare and verify. Verification also involves