Appendix F Detailed Cover Type Tables - USDA Rural Development
Appendix F Detailed Cover Type Tables - USDA Rural Development
Appendix F Detailed Cover Type Tables - USDA Rural Development
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Bemidji – Grand Rapids<br />
Biological Assessment and Evaluation<br />
underneath the litter layer are usually whitish and lack chlorophyll (Wagner and Wagner, 1981). The<br />
plant first emerges from the leaf litter in June or July and can often be identified into October.<br />
Species Habitat<br />
This species occurs in rich hardwood sites in full to partial shade, typically on north‐facing slopes on<br />
moist, mineral‐rich soils (Ostlie, 1990c) and often found at the base of basswood trees. The fern grows<br />
in the leaf litter, and is dependent on mycorrhizal associations that allow it to grow whether or not it<br />
emerges above the surface of the duff. Under some habitat conditions, the fern can remain below<br />
ground or below the duff surface for several years (Berlin et al., 1998). This makes observing the fern<br />
very difficult. Sites are known in the eastern Upper Peninsula of Michigan, northern Wisconsin, and<br />
Minnesota. Common associates include sugar maple, yellow birch and basswood trees, Lonicera<br />
canadensis, Carex intumescens, Caulophyllum thalictroides, Allium tricoccum, Asarum canadense,<br />
Trillium grandiflorum, and Aralia nudicaulis (Chadde 1999; MNFI 1996).<br />
This fern is very sensitive to moisture conditions and drought effects (Ostlie, 1990c). Natural succession<br />
and development of old‐growth conditions may make the area better B. mormo habitat, e.g. by allowing<br />
different mycorrhizal fungal species to colonize the soils. Conversely, these processes may not have any<br />
effect on the quality of the habitat; we do not know enough about this rare fern and its needs to be<br />
certain, although it seems to prefer mature forests (Ostlie, 1990c).<br />
The major threat to B. mormo across its range is non‐native earthworms. Some B. mormo populations<br />
and habitat are currently threatened by these worms (and others will become threatened, as the worms<br />
continue to expand their range), which have colonized hardwood stands after release (probably<br />
unintentional) from bait buckets (Berlin et al., 1998) and other sources. Many of the worms used as bait<br />
are not native to the Upper Great Lakes and do not have naturally‐occurring predators.<br />
Species Distribution and Occurrences within the Study Area<br />
B. mormo has a very limited range, known only from Minnesota,<br />
Wisconsin, and Michigan and in the Canadian province of Quebec<br />
(DNR, 2009).<br />
<strong>USDA</strong> Plants Database at:<br />
http://plants.usda.gov/java/county?state_name=Minnesota&statefips<br />
=27&symbol=BOMO2<br />
Botrychium mormo is listed by the DNR, DRM and the CNF with<br />
element occurrence data available by each agency. Point data provided<br />
by these agencies identifies 115 distinct populations throughout the<br />
Study Area. Chadde and Kudray (2001) cite 162 known occurrences in<br />
the state of Minnesota and 249 known global populations. According<br />
to DRM, the largest known concentration of plants is found on Guthrie Till plain soils of Ottertail Point of<br />
Leech Lake. This is the area that Route 1 proposes to cross. This alternative would pass through a major<br />
section of habitat for this species, immediately adjacent to a long term study site for the species.<br />
Summer 2009 surveys performed for the BGR project located 13 new populations ranging from single<br />
isolated plants to a single location with more than 300 individuals along Route 3. More than 550<br />
individual plants were observed in total, all within 500 feet of the existing transmission line corridor.<br />
New observations generally took place in areas apparently unaffected by the presence of non‐native<br />
invasive earthworms. All new locations were distant from paved roadways, were generally found<br />
between major drainage areas (a likely barrier to earthworm movement) and apparently isolated from<br />
July 2010 Species and Associated Habitat Page 4‐49