Appendix F Detailed Cover Type Tables - USDA Rural Development
Appendix F Detailed Cover Type Tables - USDA Rural Development
Appendix F Detailed Cover Type Tables - USDA Rural Development
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Bemidji – Grand Rapids<br />
Biological Assessment and Evaluation<br />
mix of upland and wet forests along Route 1. Individuals of these species will be adversely<br />
affected by initial clearing of the transmission corridor and future maintenance. B. lanceolatum,<br />
B. minangense, B. mormo and Carpinus carolinana would be adversely affected if populations<br />
are located within the area of forest removal. Strict standards must be adhered to when<br />
working in areas where Northern Hardwood Forests are the dominant cover type to prevent the<br />
movement of soils containing earthworms. Prior to construction, field surveys will be conducted<br />
to identify individual occurrences of species in this guild and route shifts will take place if<br />
possible. Where impacts are unavoidable, the applicant will obtain necessary take permits and<br />
negotiate appropriate mitigation.<br />
• DRM Orobanche uniflora determination: Route 1 Alternative is likely to jeopardize the viability<br />
of this species on the LLR. The reason for this determination is that little is known about the<br />
habitat requirements for this species, the only known northern Minnesota/LLR/CNF population<br />
of this species. The effects of more than doubling the width, and maintaining it in a more open<br />
condition, of the corridor on this species are unknown. This action has the potential to<br />
substantially alter habitat conditions for this species in this location.<br />
• Being that the extent of the population is unknown and habitat requirements are unknown, it is<br />
likely that direct impacts could occur. Indirect impacts may also occur, depending on the<br />
proximity of the Project centerline (125‐foot‐wide ROW) to the population. Construction along<br />
the south side of the Great Lakes pipeline might be able to avoid most of the currently know<br />
population, but it would pass through the former location and it is unknown the extent of the<br />
population. The new corridor may also change shading characteristics and/or soil moisture<br />
characteristics. The effect that such changes may have is unknown.<br />
• The DRM have indicated that the full extent of the population is unknown, and that this species<br />
may still be present along the south side of the Great Lakes pipeline (per 1997 observation) as<br />
well as other locations within the Route. Documentation of this species is problematic, as it is<br />
visually observable for a very brief period – several weeks, usually in mid June ‐ and is rather<br />
inconspicuous. If other undocumented populations are present in the construction zone, they<br />
may be directly and/or indirectly impacted by tree and shrub removal, construction traffic, pole<br />
installation and maintenance activities.<br />
Route 2 Alternative (US 2)<br />
• CNF: The project may adversely impact individuals, but is not likely to result in a loss of viability<br />
in the Planning Area, nor cause a trend forward Federal listing.<br />
• DNR: The project may adversely impact individuals, but is not likely to result in a loss of viability<br />
in the Planning Area, nor cause a trend forward Federal listing. Botrychium dissectum, B.<br />
minangense, B. mormo and B. simplex are known to occur on Route 2. Where individuals or<br />
populations of these species are present within the clearing area of the transmission corridor,<br />
adverse effects may occur. While the species B. simplex isadapted to openings, individuals may<br />
be adversely affected where clearing of canopy takes place above individuals adapted to shaded<br />
habitat. B. lanceolatum, B. minangense and B. mormo would be adversely affected if<br />
populations are located within the area of forest removal. Strict standards must be adhered to<br />
when working in areas where Northern Hardwood Forests are the dominant cover type to<br />
prevent the movement of soils containing earthworms. Prior to construction, field surveys will<br />
be conducted to identify individual occurrences of species in this guild and route shifts will take<br />
place if possible. Where impacts are unavoidable, the applicant will obtain necessary take<br />
permits and negotiate appropriate mitigation.<br />
July 2010 Environmental Consequences Page 5‐98