18.06.2014 Views

Appendix F Detailed Cover Type Tables - USDA Rural Development

Appendix F Detailed Cover Type Tables - USDA Rural Development

Appendix F Detailed Cover Type Tables - USDA Rural Development

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Bemidji – Grand Rapids<br />

Biological Assessment and Evaluation<br />

• DNR and DRM: May adversely impact individuals, but not likely to result in a loss of viability in<br />

the Planning Area, nor cause a trend toward Federal listing. Some individuals may be subjected<br />

to habitat loss. Right‐of‐way clearing would increase the area of grassland habitat available for<br />

prey species.<br />

Route 2 Alternative (US 2)<br />

• CNF: Not listed<br />

• DNR and DRM: May adversely impact individuals, but not likely to result in a loss of viability in<br />

the Planning Area, nor cause a trend toward Federal listing. Some individuals may be subjected<br />

to habitat loss. Right‐of‐way clearing would increase the area of grassland habitat available for<br />

prey species.<br />

Route 3 Alternative (Northern Route)<br />

• CNF: Not listed.<br />

• DNR and DRM: May adversely impact individuals, but not likely to result in a loss of viability in<br />

the Planning Area, nor cause a trend toward Federal listing. Some individuals may be subjected<br />

to habitat loss. Right‐of‐way clearing would increase the area of grassland habitat available for<br />

prey species.<br />

5.2.3.2 Pine Marten (Martes Americana)<br />

Pine martens are known to occur within the Study Area in appropriate forested habitats.<br />

Direct & Indirect Effects<br />

Construction of transmission line infrastructure requires the permanent removal of trees within the<br />

ROW, which would reduce the amount of appropriate habitat available for this species.<br />

Human activity along the chosen route will be high during construction when compared to nearby areas<br />

of unfragmented habitat. This may prevent pine marten from using suitable habitat along the ROW,<br />

especially if individuals have a low tolerance for humans.<br />

Route 1 Alternative (Great Lakes Pipeline)<br />

No DNR, DRM, or CNF observations are available for this species. No observations of pine martens were<br />

made during the EP survey.<br />

Forested habitat would be removed as a result of Route 1 construction, which could reduce the amount<br />

of appropriate habitat available for this species. Impacts to individuals and appropriate habitat areas will<br />

be minimized by using BMPs during construction activities. If an individual is found during construction,<br />

potential impacts and avoidance will be assessed and coordinated with the appropriate agencies.<br />

Route 2 Alternative (US 2)<br />

No DNR, DRM, or CNF observations are available for this species. No observations of pine martens were<br />

made during the EP survey, although appropriate habitat may be present.<br />

Forested habitat would be removed as a result of Route 2 construction, which could reduce the amount<br />

of appropriate habitat available for this species. Impacts to individuals and appropriate habitat areas will<br />

be minimized by using BMPs during construction activities. If an individual is found during construction,<br />

potential impacts and avoidance will be assessed and coordinated with the appropriate agencies.<br />

July 2010 Environmental Consequences Page 5‐53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!