Appendix F Detailed Cover Type Tables - USDA Rural Development
Appendix F Detailed Cover Type Tables - USDA Rural Development
Appendix F Detailed Cover Type Tables - USDA Rural Development
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Bemidji – Grand Rapids<br />
Biological Assessment and Evaluation<br />
• DNR and DRM: May adversely impact individuals, but not likely to result in a loss of viability in<br />
the Planning Area, nor cause a trend toward Federal listing. Some individuals may be subjected<br />
to habitat loss. Right‐of‐way clearing would increase the area of grassland habitat available for<br />
prey species.<br />
Route 2 Alternative (US 2)<br />
• CNF: Not listed<br />
• DNR and DRM: May adversely impact individuals, but not likely to result in a loss of viability in<br />
the Planning Area, nor cause a trend toward Federal listing. Some individuals may be subjected<br />
to habitat loss. Right‐of‐way clearing would increase the area of grassland habitat available for<br />
prey species.<br />
Route 3 Alternative (Northern Route)<br />
• CNF: Not listed.<br />
• DNR and DRM: May adversely impact individuals, but not likely to result in a loss of viability in<br />
the Planning Area, nor cause a trend toward Federal listing. Some individuals may be subjected<br />
to habitat loss. Right‐of‐way clearing would increase the area of grassland habitat available for<br />
prey species.<br />
5.2.3.2 Pine Marten (Martes Americana)<br />
Pine martens are known to occur within the Study Area in appropriate forested habitats.<br />
Direct & Indirect Effects<br />
Construction of transmission line infrastructure requires the permanent removal of trees within the<br />
ROW, which would reduce the amount of appropriate habitat available for this species.<br />
Human activity along the chosen route will be high during construction when compared to nearby areas<br />
of unfragmented habitat. This may prevent pine marten from using suitable habitat along the ROW,<br />
especially if individuals have a low tolerance for humans.<br />
Route 1 Alternative (Great Lakes Pipeline)<br />
No DNR, DRM, or CNF observations are available for this species. No observations of pine martens were<br />
made during the EP survey.<br />
Forested habitat would be removed as a result of Route 1 construction, which could reduce the amount<br />
of appropriate habitat available for this species. Impacts to individuals and appropriate habitat areas will<br />
be minimized by using BMPs during construction activities. If an individual is found during construction,<br />
potential impacts and avoidance will be assessed and coordinated with the appropriate agencies.<br />
Route 2 Alternative (US 2)<br />
No DNR, DRM, or CNF observations are available for this species. No observations of pine martens were<br />
made during the EP survey, although appropriate habitat may be present.<br />
Forested habitat would be removed as a result of Route 2 construction, which could reduce the amount<br />
of appropriate habitat available for this species. Impacts to individuals and appropriate habitat areas will<br />
be minimized by using BMPs during construction activities. If an individual is found during construction,<br />
potential impacts and avoidance will be assessed and coordinated with the appropriate agencies.<br />
July 2010 Environmental Consequences Page 5‐53