Appendix F Detailed Cover Type Tables - USDA Rural Development
Appendix F Detailed Cover Type Tables - USDA Rural Development
Appendix F Detailed Cover Type Tables - USDA Rural Development
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Bemidji – Grand Rapids<br />
Biological Assessment and Evaluation<br />
Under the Endangered Species Act, the following factors determine whether or not a species should be<br />
listed as endangered or threatened:<br />
• the present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of the species’ habitat or<br />
range;<br />
• overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes;<br />
• disease or predation;<br />
• the inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; and<br />
• other natural or manmade factors affecting the species’ continued existence.<br />
A species is listed under one of two categories, endangered or threatened, depending on its status and<br />
the degree of threat it faces. An “endangered species” is one that is in danger of extinction throughout<br />
all or a significant portion of its range. A “threatened species” is one that is likely to become endangered<br />
in the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range (USFWS Endangered Species<br />
Bulletin November/December 1999).<br />
3.4.2 CNF RFSS Listing<br />
Region 9 RFSS are identified by applying two means to generate lists. Species included as RFSS include<br />
FWS Candidates for listing under the Endangered Species Act, species delisted in the last five years<br />
under ESA, and species ranked by The Nature Conservancy as G1‐G3, T1‐T3, and N1‐N3. Risk evaluations<br />
are used to determine which other species to add to the list. State Natural Heritage Program (NHP) S1,<br />
S2, State Threatened and Endangered, and species considered at risk on individual Forests are screened<br />
using a risk evaluation process. This evaluation considers the species abundance, distribution,<br />
population trend, habitat integrity, and population vulnerability. (FSM 2600, Ch 2670).<br />
3.4.3 DRM Listing<br />
The DRM maintains a list of endangered, threatened, and sensitive species on the Leech Lake<br />
Reservation. As of January 2007, forty species of plants were listed. They include trees, orchids, ferns,<br />
and grasses. Habitats for the listed species include hardwood forests, coniferous forests, and bogs. The<br />
future existence of the listed species on the Leech Lake Reservation is mainly threatened by loss of<br />
suitable habitat. Activities that disturb or change the condition of soil, water, or sunlight in an area may<br />
result in conditions in which the current inhabitants of a site can no longer survive and reproduce.<br />
(Leech Lake DRM web site: http://www.lldrm.org/plants.html)<br />
3.4.4 DNR Listing<br />
The species included in the Rare Species Guide are those designated as endangered, threatened, or<br />
special concern in Minnesota Rules, Chapter 6134, parts 6134.0200 to 6134.0400. Generically, this is<br />
referred to as Minnesota's List of Endangered, Threatened, and Special Concern Species(List). The List<br />
was last revised in 1996, but is currently undergoing a formal rule revision process. Once the revision<br />
process is completed, additional species profiles will be added to the Rare Species Guide, and status<br />
designations and taxonomy information will be updated as appropriate. A species is considered<br />
endangered if the species is threatened with extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its<br />
range within Minnesota.<br />
A species is considered threatened if the species is likely to become endangered within the foreseeable<br />
future throughout all or a significant portion of its range within Minnesota. A species is considered a<br />
species of special concern if, although the species is not endangered or threatened, it is extremely<br />
uncommon in Minnesota, or has unique or highly specific habitat requirements and deserves careful<br />
July 2010 Survey Coordination and Methods Page 3‐5