Appendix F Detailed Cover Type Tables - USDA Rural Development
Appendix F Detailed Cover Type Tables - USDA Rural Development
Appendix F Detailed Cover Type Tables - USDA Rural Development
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Bemidji – Grand Rapids<br />
Biological Assessment and Evaluation<br />
Route 2 Alternative (US 2)<br />
No CNF, DRM, or DNR documented observations of four‐toed salamanders are located within one mile<br />
of Route 2. No observations of this species were made during the EP surveys of this route, although<br />
appropriate habitat may be present.<br />
This species may be especially sensitive to the conversion of forested wetlands to open habitats.<br />
Minimal habitat loss would occur as a result of forest removal.<br />
Impacts to individuals and appropriate habitat areas will be minimized by using BMPs during<br />
construction in wetlands to minimize impacts to these areas. If an individual is found during<br />
construction, potential impacts and avoidance will be assessed and coordinated with the appropriate<br />
agencies.<br />
Route 3 Alternative (Northern Route)<br />
No CNF or DNR documented observations of four‐toed salamanders are located within one mile of<br />
Route 3. No observations of this species were made during the BGR surveys of this route, although<br />
appropriate habitat may be present.<br />
This species may be especially sensitive to the conversion of forested wetlands to open habitats.<br />
Minimal habitat loss would occur as a result of forest removal.<br />
Impacts to individuals and appropriate habitat areas will be minimized by using BMPs during<br />
construction in wetlands to minimize impacts to these areas. If an individual is found during<br />
construction, potential impacts and avoidance will be assessed and coordinated with the appropriate<br />
agencies.<br />
No Build Alternative<br />
The no build alternative would maintain the existing conditions along each alternative. No adverse or<br />
beneficial impact would occur.<br />
Determination of Effects<br />
Route 1 Alternative (Great Lakes Pipeline)<br />
• CNF, DNR and DRM: May adversely impact individuals, but not likely to result in a loss of viability<br />
in the Planning Area, nor cause a trend toward Federal listing. Some individuals may be<br />
subjected to habitat loss.<br />
Route 2 Alternative (US 2)<br />
• CNF, DNR and DRM: May adversely impact individuals, but not likely to result in a loss of viability<br />
in the Planning Area, nor cause a trend toward Federal listing. Some individuals may be<br />
subjected to habitat loss.<br />
Route 3 Alternative (Northern Route)<br />
• CNF, DNR and DRM: May adversely impact individuals, but not likely to result in a loss of viability<br />
in the Planning Area, nor cause a trend toward Federal listing. Some individuals may be<br />
subjected to habitat loss.<br />
5.2.2.2 Red‐backed salamander (Plethodon cinerus)<br />
Red‐backed salamanders are known to occur within the Study Area in appropriate forested habitats.<br />
July 2010 Environmental Consequences Page 5‐48