Appendix F Detailed Cover Type Tables - USDA Rural Development
Appendix F Detailed Cover Type Tables - USDA Rural Development
Appendix F Detailed Cover Type Tables - USDA Rural Development
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Bemidji – Grand Rapids<br />
Biological Assessment and Evaluation<br />
individual is found during construction, potential impacts and avoidance will be assessed and<br />
coordinated with the appropriate agencies.<br />
Route 3 Alternative (Northern Route)<br />
No DNR or DRM observations of this species occur within one mile of Route 3, nor were any located<br />
during the EP survey. This species is not tracked by the CNF.<br />
A minimal amount of forested and shrubby habitat would be converted into open habitat. This may<br />
remove appropriate eastern spotted skunk habitat from the vicinity of Route 1. Impacts to individuals<br />
and appropriate habitat areas will be minimized by using BMPs during construction activities. If an<br />
individual is found during construction, potential impacts and avoidance will be assessed and<br />
coordinated with the appropriate agencies.<br />
No Build Alternative<br />
The no build alternative would maintain the existing conditions along each alternative. No adverse or<br />
beneficial impact would occur.<br />
Determination of Effects<br />
Route 1 Alternative (Great Lakes Pipeline)<br />
• CNF: Not listed.<br />
• DNR and DRM: May adversely impact individuals, but not likely to result in a loss of viability in<br />
the Planning Area, nor cause a trend toward Federal listing. Some individuals may be subjected<br />
to habitat loss, however, observations in the Study Area are listed as questionable and this<br />
species may not be present.<br />
Route 2 Alternative (US 2)<br />
• CNF: Not listed.<br />
• DNR and DRM: May adversely impact individuals, but not likely to result in a loss of viability in<br />
the Planning Area, nor cause a trend toward Federal listing. Some individuals may be subjected<br />
to habitat loss, however, observations in the Study Area are listed as questionable and this<br />
species may not be present.<br />
Route 3 Alternative (Northern Route)<br />
• CNF: Not listed.<br />
• DNR and DRM: May adversely impact individuals, but not likely to result in a loss of viability in<br />
the Planning Area, nor cause a trend toward Federal listing. Some individuals may be subjected<br />
to habitat loss, however, observations in the Study Area are listed as questionable and this<br />
species may not be present.<br />
5.2.3.7 Northern Bog Lemming (Synaptommys borealis)<br />
One DNR observation of this species is located in the Study Area, indicating appropriate habitat is<br />
present. These areas would likely be restricted to wetland habitats with sphagnum moss and an<br />
ericaceous shrub layer, such as spruce bogs.<br />
Direct & Indirect Effects<br />
Current transmission line construction practices minimize impacts to wetland habitats by spanning these<br />
areas (when possible), constructing these segments during the winter months (when appropriate), using<br />
mats to minimize impacts from heavy equipment (when appropriate), allowing native vegetation to re‐<br />
July 2010 Environmental Consequences Page 5‐60