Appendix F Detailed Cover Type Tables - USDA Rural Development
Appendix F Detailed Cover Type Tables - USDA Rural Development
Appendix F Detailed Cover Type Tables - USDA Rural Development
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Bemidji – Grand Rapids<br />
Biological Assessment and Evaluation<br />
Species Description<br />
The Conservation Assessment for Red‐shouldered Hawks (Buteo lineatus) (Jacobs & Jacobs, 2002)<br />
includes the following species description:<br />
The Red‐shouldered Hawk is a medium sized raptor that exhibits reverse sexual<br />
dimorphism (females are larger, but to a lesser degree than accipiters). Males measured<br />
in total length 43‐58 cm (17‐23 in) and females 48‐61 cm (19‐24 in) (Crocoll 1994). Mass<br />
from breeding birds found males and females averaged 550 g and 701 g respectively in<br />
Michigan (Craighead and Craighead 1956) and 544 g (486‐582) and 670 g (593‐774)<br />
respectively in Wisconsin (J. & E. Jacobs in Crocoll 1994).<br />
Adult Plumage is dark brown dorsally with black and white bands on the flight feathers.<br />
Ventrally the breast and belly are colored with orange, pale orange or rusty reddish<br />
horizontal barring. Upper lesser wing coverts (“shoulders”) are rusty brown. Tail is<br />
relatively longer when compared to other eastern Buteos with (when viewed dorsally)<br />
three distinct narrow white bands (approx. 1 cm wide) separated by wider (approx. 3<br />
cm) corresponding black bands. Cere, legs, and feet are pale yellow to orange in color.<br />
The iris color is dark brown (pers. obs.)<br />
Species Habitat<br />
Red‐shouldered hawks require a substantial food base, and at least during the breeding season they are<br />
distinctly territorial. The red‐shouldered hawk is associated with mixed coniferous‐deciduous<br />
woodlands, moist hardwood forests, swamps, river bottomlands, and wooded marsh openings, with the<br />
borders of lakes and streams or other wetlands being especially favored habitat (Johnsgard, 1990).<br />
Widespread destruction and fragmentation of riparian habitats has forced this species to rely on upland<br />
forests to a greater extent (Ebbers 1991a). In such areas, human‐made grasslands may replace wetlands<br />
as hunting habitat (Ebbers 1991a).<br />
Nesting habitat is characterized by taller than average closed‐canopy trees with well‐developed crowns.<br />
American beech and sugar maple are frequently selected for nesting, where the nest is usually built in a<br />
secure crotch of a large‐diameter tree situated well below the canopy (Ebbers, 1991a). Morris and<br />
Lemon (1983) found that red‐shouldered hawk nests were typically found in mature deciduous forest<br />
stands dominated by sugar maple and American beech and characterized by mature trees and a reduced<br />
understory. A two‐year study located 20 red‐shouldered hawk nests on the CNF. These nests occurred in<br />
closed‐canopy mature northern hardwoods (17 nests) or mature aspen (three nests) interspersed with<br />
wetlands (McLeod and Anderson 1997)<br />
Home ranges for the red‐shouldered hawk are smaller when compared to those of the northern<br />
goshawk. In Michigan, Craighead and Craighead (1956) found that mean breeding home ranges were 63<br />
hectares, but varied from 7.7 to 155 hectares.<br />
Species Distribution and Occurrences within the Study Area<br />
The red‐shouldered hawk’s range generally extends between the Mississippi River Valley and the<br />
Atlantic Coast. A separate population also resides along the Pacific Coast in California (All About Birds<br />
2009). Red–shouldered hawks are at the northern periphery of their range in the National Forests of<br />
Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan (USFS, 2002). Much of this species’ former habitat in southern<br />
Minnesota was destroyed or fragmented by human development, logging, and agriculture (USFS 2004).<br />
There are presently about 430 known or suspected nesting sites in Minnesota; a majority of these sites<br />
are located within just a few meta‐populations (USFS, 2004). One of these meta‐populations occurs on<br />
July 2010 Species and Associated Habitat Page 4‐10