Appendix F Detailed Cover Type Tables - USDA Rural Development
Appendix F Detailed Cover Type Tables - USDA Rural Development
Appendix F Detailed Cover Type Tables - USDA Rural Development
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Bemidji – Grand Rapids<br />
Biological Assessment and Evaluation<br />
Route 1 Alternative (Great Lakes Pipeline)<br />
No CNF or DRM observations of black terns or black tern breeding colonies have been made within one<br />
mile of Route 1. Additionally, no observations were made during the EP surveys. The DNR does not track<br />
black terns. This alternative does cross large sedge meadows which may contain appropriate foraging<br />
habitat, but may not support breeding. Minimal impacts to appropriate wetland habitat would occur as<br />
a result of structure placement. Right‐of‐way clearing would increase the area of wet meadow and<br />
emergent habitat available for this species.<br />
No nests are known to exist within the route. Impacts to individuals and appropriate habitat areas will<br />
be minimized by applying BMPs to construction activities. If an active nest is found during construction,<br />
potential impacts and avoidance will be assessed and coordinated with the appropriate agencies.<br />
Route 2 Alternative (US 2)<br />
One CNF documented black tern colony is within one mile of Route 2, in a diverse wetland complex. No<br />
observations were made during the EP surveys. The DNR does not track black terns. Where this route<br />
alternative crosses appropriate wetland areas, minimal impacts would occur as a result of structure<br />
placement. Right‐of‐way clearing would increase the area of wet meadow and emergent habitat<br />
available for this species.<br />
No nests are known to exist within the route. Impacts to individuals and appropriate habitat areas will<br />
be minimized by applying BMPs to construction activities. If an active nest is found during construction,<br />
potential impacts and avoidance will be assessed and coordinated with the appropriate agencies.<br />
Route 3 Alternative (Northern Route)<br />
No CNF or DRM observations of black terns or documented black tern breeding colonies have been<br />
within one mile of Route 3. However, five observations of black terns were made during the BGR survey.<br />
Observations were made in the vicinity of large wetlands areas, often supporting floating vegetative<br />
mats. These wetland complexes contain habitat which likely occurs in sufficient enough of area to<br />
support breeding, as a number of individuals were observed at these locations landing and taking off<br />
from vegetative mats. The DNR does not track black terns. Minimal impacts to appropriate wetland<br />
habitat would occur as a result of structure placement. Right‐of‐way clearing would increase the area of<br />
wet meadow and emergent habitat available for this species.<br />
No nests are known to exist within the route. Impacts to individuals and appropriate habitat areas will<br />
be minimized by applying BMPs to construction activities. If an active nest is found during construction,<br />
potential impacts and avoidance will be assessed and coordinated with the appropriate agencies.<br />
No Build Alternative<br />
The no build alternative would maintain the existing conditions along each alternative. No habitat<br />
impact would occur.<br />
Determination of Effects<br />
Route 1 Alternative (Great Lakes Pipeline)<br />
• CNF and DRM: May adversely impact individuals, but not likely to result in a loss of viability in<br />
the Planning Area, nor cause a trend toward Federal listing. Minimal area of appropriate habitat<br />
area would be reduced as a result of structure placement in wetlands. Right‐of‐way clearing<br />
would increase the area of wet meadow and emergent habitat available for this species.<br />
• DNR: Not listed.<br />
July 2010 Environmental Consequences Page 5‐24