24.06.2014 Views

FINAL REPORT - San Bernardino Superior Court

FINAL REPORT - San Bernardino Superior Court

FINAL REPORT - San Bernardino Superior Court

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section 5: SCLAA Bond Expenditures<br />

5.2. Review and amend the City’s financial statements so that the loan agreement between the<br />

City and SCLAA for the purchase of library parcels reflects the terms of the agreement.<br />

Specifically, that the loan is placed in the City’s Development Impact Fee fund.<br />

5.3. Direct the City Manager to conduct an evaluation of the use of SCLAA bond funds for<br />

the Victorville 2 Power Plant project including an analysis of the amount of funds<br />

specifically allocated to SCLAA (less the Victorville pledge) that were used for the<br />

project. At the completion of such analysis, establish a loan agreement between the City<br />

and SCLAA for the repayment of the amount of SCLAA bond funds expended on the<br />

Victorville 2 Power Plant Project less the net amount 4 pledged by Victorville for<br />

repayment of the bonds.<br />

The SCLAA Board should:<br />

5.4. Direct the City Manager to establish an accounting system for all expenditures of SCLAA<br />

bond funds. Such a system should include an estimate of the amount of expenditures that<br />

are unrelated to the redevelopment of the former GAFB and would therefore require use<br />

of the Victorville pledge of funds from its own territory.<br />

5.5. Direct the City Manager to establish a policy requiring the SCLAA Board of Directors to<br />

justify the use of SCLAA bond funds when used for projects outside of GAFB parcels.<br />

Such a policy should require a detailed justification for how the expenditures directly<br />

benefit the redevelopment of the former GAFB before the issuance and expenditure of<br />

future tax increment bonds.<br />

5.6. Review current contracts for potential conflicts of interest. This would help ensure that<br />

the SCLAA Board of Directors makes decisions in the interest of the SCLAA.<br />

The VVEDA Commission should:<br />

5.7. Consider a review of the delegated authority provided to the City of Victorville for<br />

governance and administration of the SCLAA to ensure representation of each individual<br />

jurisdiction’s interests in the governance and administration of redevelopment activities.<br />

Costs and Benefits<br />

The costs to the City of implementing these recommendations would include staff time and<br />

approximately $250,000 for the revision of the loan agreement for the library parcels and up to<br />

$76.2 million (but likely less after subtracting the amounts pledged by Victorville that would<br />

have otherwise been allocated to its own territory) to pay back the funds expended for the<br />

Victorville 2 Power Plant Project. The benefits of implementing the recommendations would<br />

include improved financial health of SCLAA. Implementation of governance recommendations<br />

would ensure that full, fair and proportionate representation of each jurisdictions’ interests would<br />

be represented on the Board.<br />

4 After the funds spent on the Interchange Project are considered.<br />

5-12<br />

Harvey M. Rose Associates, LLC

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!