FINAL REPORT - San Bernardino Superior Court
FINAL REPORT - San Bernardino Superior Court
FINAL REPORT - San Bernardino Superior Court
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Section 5: SCLAA Bond Expenditures<br />
5.2. Review and amend the City’s financial statements so that the loan agreement between the<br />
City and SCLAA for the purchase of library parcels reflects the terms of the agreement.<br />
Specifically, that the loan is placed in the City’s Development Impact Fee fund.<br />
5.3. Direct the City Manager to conduct an evaluation of the use of SCLAA bond funds for<br />
the Victorville 2 Power Plant project including an analysis of the amount of funds<br />
specifically allocated to SCLAA (less the Victorville pledge) that were used for the<br />
project. At the completion of such analysis, establish a loan agreement between the City<br />
and SCLAA for the repayment of the amount of SCLAA bond funds expended on the<br />
Victorville 2 Power Plant Project less the net amount 4 pledged by Victorville for<br />
repayment of the bonds.<br />
The SCLAA Board should:<br />
5.4. Direct the City Manager to establish an accounting system for all expenditures of SCLAA<br />
bond funds. Such a system should include an estimate of the amount of expenditures that<br />
are unrelated to the redevelopment of the former GAFB and would therefore require use<br />
of the Victorville pledge of funds from its own territory.<br />
5.5. Direct the City Manager to establish a policy requiring the SCLAA Board of Directors to<br />
justify the use of SCLAA bond funds when used for projects outside of GAFB parcels.<br />
Such a policy should require a detailed justification for how the expenditures directly<br />
benefit the redevelopment of the former GAFB before the issuance and expenditure of<br />
future tax increment bonds.<br />
5.6. Review current contracts for potential conflicts of interest. This would help ensure that<br />
the SCLAA Board of Directors makes decisions in the interest of the SCLAA.<br />
The VVEDA Commission should:<br />
5.7. Consider a review of the delegated authority provided to the City of Victorville for<br />
governance and administration of the SCLAA to ensure representation of each individual<br />
jurisdiction’s interests in the governance and administration of redevelopment activities.<br />
Costs and Benefits<br />
The costs to the City of implementing these recommendations would include staff time and<br />
approximately $250,000 for the revision of the loan agreement for the library parcels and up to<br />
$76.2 million (but likely less after subtracting the amounts pledged by Victorville that would<br />
have otherwise been allocated to its own territory) to pay back the funds expended for the<br />
Victorville 2 Power Plant Project. The benefits of implementing the recommendations would<br />
include improved financial health of SCLAA. Implementation of governance recommendations<br />
would ensure that full, fair and proportionate representation of each jurisdictions’ interests would<br />
be represented on the Board.<br />
4 After the funds spent on the Interchange Project are considered.<br />
5-12<br />
Harvey M. Rose Associates, LLC