FINAL REPORT - San Bernardino Superior Court
FINAL REPORT - San Bernardino Superior Court
FINAL REPORT - San Bernardino Superior Court
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Executive Summary<br />
purposes that directly benefit the redevelopment of GAFB. The VVEDA JPA also delegates the<br />
authority of the management and operation of the GAFB parcels, including budgeting authority,<br />
redevelopment authority, and all management and operational authority to the Victorville City<br />
Council, “which shall act on behalf of the [VVEDA] Commission on all such matters.” The City<br />
of Victorville also had authority and responsibility for the treasury function of the VVEDA JPA<br />
until late 2009, when the VVEDA Board of Directors voted to transfer the function to the City of<br />
Apple Valley.<br />
The Victorville City Council, acting as the SCLAA Board of Directors, appears to have<br />
repeatedly mishandled SCLAA bond expenditures. In at least three instances the SCLAA Board<br />
and City management mishandled SCLAA bond funds by either: (1) poorly justifying<br />
expenditures; (2) failing to properly identify funding sources and accounting for Victorville’s<br />
pledged amount to SCLAA; or, (3) potentially expending funds allocated to GAFB on parcels<br />
outside of GAFB and not primarily or directly for the purpose for the redevelopment of GAFB.<br />
Based on these findings, the City Council should:<br />
5.1. Revise the loan agreement between SCLAA and the City so that it incorporates back<br />
interest that should have accrued between 2005 and 2010 based on the State Pooled<br />
Money Investment Account average annual yields for the Local Agency Investment<br />
Fund.<br />
5.2. Review and amend the City’s financial statements so that the loan agreement between the<br />
City and SCLAA for the purchase of library parcels reflects the terms of the agreement.<br />
Specifically, that the loan is placed in the City’s Development Impact Fee fund.<br />
5.3. Direct the City Manager to conduct an evaluation of the use of SCLAA bond funds for<br />
the Victorville 2 Power Plant project including an analysis of the amount of funds<br />
specifically allocated to SCLAA (less the Victorville pledge) that were used for the<br />
project. At the completion of such analysis, establish a loan agreement between the City<br />
and SCLAA for the repayment of the amount of SCLAA bond funds expended on the<br />
Victorville 2 Power Plant Project less the net amount 1 pledged by Victorville for<br />
repayment of the bonds.<br />
Based on these findings, the SCLAA Board should:<br />
5.4. Direct the City Manager to establish an accounting system for all expenditures of SCLAA<br />
bond funds. Such a system should include an estimate of the amount of expenditures that<br />
are unrelated to the redevelopment of the former GAFB and would therefore require use<br />
of the Victorville pledge of funds from its own territory.<br />
1 After the funds spent on the Interchange Project are considered.<br />
vii<br />
Harvey M. Rose Associates, LLC