FINAL REPORT - San Bernardino Superior Court
FINAL REPORT - San Bernardino Superior Court
FINAL REPORT - San Bernardino Superior Court
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Executive Summary<br />
Section 4. SCLA Hangar Development<br />
In September 2005 the City Council, in its role as the Southern California Logistics Airport<br />
Authority (SCLAA) Board of Directors, entered into a no-bid agreement with CBS Aviation<br />
Development, LLC for the construction of hangar facilities at Southern California Logistics<br />
Airport. The development agreement was based on a proposal put forward by the manager/owner<br />
of CBS Aviation Development, an individual with no prior relationship to the City and whose<br />
background and competency was not fully known. Further, there is no evidence that sufficient<br />
background research was conducted on CBS Aviation Development or its owner until two<br />
months after the SCLAA entered into a ground lease agreement with the contractor.<br />
Although the original hangar development agreement called for the construction to be<br />
completely funded by CBS Aviation Development, the SCLAA spent approximately $54 million<br />
for CBS Aviation Development work on the hangar development project and nearly an<br />
additional $50 million for a second firm, KND Affiliates, LLC, to complete the project after City<br />
management lost confidence in the abilities of CBS Aviation Development. The hangar<br />
development project may have ultimately cost SCLAA approximately $103 million to complete<br />
four aircraft hangars.<br />
The hangar development project at the Southern California Logistics Airport was undertaken<br />
without proper controls to prevent cost overruns, the misuse or loss of public funds, or fraud.<br />
Specifically, there is no evidence that City management clearly estimated costs or presented the<br />
SCLAA Board (City Council) with a clear project budget or development plan before disbursing<br />
funds to CBS Aviation Development. Further, City and SCLAA management did not put proper<br />
controls in place during the project to ensure that outside contractors: (1) properly performed<br />
their duties; (2) used public funds efficiently; or, (3) were prevented from misusing public funds.<br />
The lack of controls is evidenced by the inability of City management to account for the entirety<br />
of public funds, including nearly $13 million provided to CBS Aviation Development.<br />
Based on these findings, the SCLAA Board of Directors should:<br />
4.1. Adopt and implement procurement procedures for the management and operation of the<br />
Southern California Logistics Airport that incorporates competitive bidding for the<br />
design, development, and construction of airport facilities.<br />
4.2. Adopt and implement SCLAA policies and procedures that institute sufficient financial<br />
controls for airport capital projects. Such controls should be consistent with best practices<br />
for public sector capital projects.<br />
Section 5. SCLAA Bond Expenditures<br />
The VVEDA JPA stipulates the uses of tax increment raised on parcels of the former GAFB as<br />
well as tax increment from the member jurisdictions’ territories. The VVEDA JPA specifically<br />
requires that tax increment revenues which are to be allocated to GAFB should only be used for<br />
vi<br />
Harvey M. Rose Associates, LLC