FINAL REPORT - San Bernardino Superior Court
FINAL REPORT - San Bernardino Superior Court
FINAL REPORT - San Bernardino Superior Court
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Section 1: Financial Condition<br />
(4) Any residual balance in the Trust Fund is then redistributed to any county, cities,<br />
special districts, schools, county education offices, and community colleges that were<br />
impacted by the creation, and now dissolution, of the redevelopment agency.<br />
In accordance with AB 26, the City of Victorville now has control of the former VVRDA’s<br />
assets and liabilities and must now dispose of the assets and meet all of VVRDA’s payment<br />
obligations. Proceeds from the City’s disposal of assets would be deposited into the Trust Fund<br />
controlled by the County Auditor and then distributed according to the priority distribution listed<br />
above. The City receives allocated tax increment from the County Auditor and makes the actual<br />
payments to the obligations listed in the ROPS.<br />
Recognized Obligations<br />
The City was required to submit a draft Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) to the<br />
County Auditor by March 1, 2012. There are three main categories of debt and obligations<br />
included in the City’s ROPS which are eligible for payment through tax increment funds. In<br />
order of payment priority, these categories are:<br />
• Debt obligation from Tax Allocation Bonds issued under the former VVRDA;<br />
• Debt obligation from SCLAA issued bonds because tax increment designated for<br />
VVRDA were pledged to repay several of the bonds when they were first issued;<br />
• Third party contracts and agreements, including inter-fund loans, and,<br />
• Administrative costs associated with operating the Successor Agency, such as salaries for<br />
personnel.<br />
However, if there is insufficient tax increment to meet these payment obligations, the City, as<br />
Successor Agency, would be required to meet these obligations through the use of reserve funds<br />
or inter-fund loans. This provision of the law has been upheld by the California Supreme <strong>Court</strong>.<br />
According to the City’s financial statements, the principal balance of Tax Allocation Bonds<br />
issued under the former VVRDA was $42,395,000 as of June 30, 2011. Based on an analysis of<br />
VVRDA’s receipt of tax increment and debt service payments over the last four fiscal years, the<br />
City should still be able to receive sufficient tax increment funds to make debt service payments<br />
for the VVRDA bonds. As shown in Table 1.11 below, the City had an average surplus of<br />
$4,861,822 in tax increment over the past four fiscal years after debt service payments were<br />
made, though tax increment has steadily decreased.<br />
1-17<br />
Harvey M. Rose Associates, LLC