FINAL REPORT - San Bernardino Superior Court

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2011‐2012 San Bernardino County Grand Jury Final Report MEALS/NUTRITION The kitchen area – Is it clean? Yes Are knives and chemicals locked? Yes and secured by staff; inventoried by staff at beginning, middle and end of each shift. Have the inmates working in the kitchen been trained? Yes. Some arrive trained, others are trained by staff; each attend 8‐hour food handler’s class and receive certification. Have the inmates had a medical clearance/review before assignment? Yes Are meals served in the cell, day room or at a central cafeteria? All noted locations Are inmates permitted to converse during meals? No Length of time allowed for eating? Minimum of 15 minutes HEALTH What type of on‐site health facility is available to inmates? Routine health maintenance with a Supervising RN. What type of on‐site dental facility is available to inmates? None on‐site; services provided at WVDC or Central Detention Center (CDC). What off‐site hospital is used for serious health issues? Arrowhead Regional Medical Center (ARMC) and then if needed, San Bernardino Community Hospital. How are inmates transported to off‐site facilities? By deputy or by ambulance, if needed. How is security handled? Inmates are shackled if more than one, otherwise transported in deputy vehicle. EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM College level/high school level/other: General Education Development (GED); vocational classes and workshops on substance abuse, parenting, anger management, living skills and cognitive skills. Name of school district providing educational services: San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools; Chaffey Joint Union High School District. Teachers – number of full‐time, number of substitutes: Eight ROP instructors, 11 Chaffey Adult Education Instructors, no substitute teachers. Number of inmates in educational program: 250‐300 inmates at any one time; 5,000 have been in the program over the last 12 months. Activities and coursework assigned by teachers? Homework is given and required each day; individual and group assignments. Relationship between educational program staff and facility staff: Excellent, most of the staff is mature and proud being mentors. 50
2011‐2012 San Bernardino County Grand Jury Final Report DOCUMENT REVIEW INMATE GRIEVANCES/COMPLAINTS: TYPES RESOLUTIONS 1. Denied white roll exchanged None; met Title 15 2. Missing phone time The time left on phone card was accurate 3. Waited 12 hours for medical Reminded nurse to check waiting area often when busy 4. Constraints were too tight & not loosened The constraints were within policy; inmate was a security risk 5. Seen by Mental Health denied services Determined to not need meds; was evaluated by Mental Health on 2 occasions, 10 days apart 6. Felt property was taken without cause Unsubstantiated; inmate did not clean up; property put in proper bin 7. Inmate roof of mouth burned by hot food Inmate instructed to blow on food to cool; offered medical services; declined 8. Inmate felt intake evaluation points did not require maximum security; not enough religious contact & materials available Another volunteer clergy was scheduled to C block inmates; inmate status remained the same 9. Grieved improper discipline After investigation, discipline upheld 10. Inmate grieved not receiving pain Was scheduled for medication review within 24 medications as prescribed hours 11. Contesting discipline for not working Found that it was for “poor work” not no work and adjusted discipline from 40‐10 days loss of good work days 12. Inmate grieved that sentence was for CDC is primarily a pre‐sentence facility GHRC, wanted CDC closer to home; no $ to get home once released; wanted to be transported to CDC upon release 13. Grieved improper medical care by LVN for Was seen by RN within 24 hours; LVN cannot headache provide independent medical care 14. Wanted to move back to Dorm 1 from The housing was determined to be within the Dorm 2, due to fear and intimidation policies 15. Inmate’s friend was questioned about amount of deposit – why? Deputy discussed with inmate that sometimes inmates are forced by others to have $ deposited for extortion Total Complaints reviewed: 15 Total Complaints during past five months: 64 51
Page 1 and 2:
FINAL REPORT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDI
Page 3 and 4:
EDITORIAL COMMITTEE From left to ri
Page 5 and 6:
Honorable Ronald M. Christianson, P
Page 7 and 8:
2011-2012 GRAND JURY SAN BERNARDINO
Page 9 and 10:
TABLE OF CONTENTS 2011-2012 GRAND J
Page 11 and 12:
CITIES/SPECIAL DISTRICTS COMMITTEE
Page 13 and 14:
2011‐2012 San Bernardino County G
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
May 15, 2012 Ted Burgnon, Foreman a
Page 25 and 26:
Executive Summary Harvey M. Rose As
Page 27 and 28:
Executive Summary year to prevent b
Page 29 and 30:
Executive Summary never completed a
Page 31 and 32:
Executive Summary purposes that dir
Page 33 and 34:
Introduction Harvey M. Rose Associa
Page 35 and 36:
Introduction Victorville was establ
Page 37 and 38:
Introduction Exhibit 1 City of Vict
Page 39 and 40:
Introduction boundaries of the Vict
Page 41 and 42:
Introduction The SCLAA operated und
Page 43 and 44:
Section 1: Financial Condition In t
Page 45 and 46:
Section 1: Financial Condition Tabl
Page 47 and 48:
Section 1: Financial Condition Cash
Page 49 and 50:
Section 1: Financial Condition Char
Page 51 and 52:
Section 1: Financial Condition has
Page 53 and 54:
Section 1: Financial Condition Char
Page 55 and 56:
Section 1: Financial Condition City
Page 57 and 58:
Section 1: Financial Condition Impa
Page 59 and 60:
Section 1: Financial Condition Tabl
Page 61 and 62:
Section 1: Financial Condition Reco
Page 63 and 64:
Section 2: Inter-fund Loans and Use
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
3. Power Plant Developments Th
Page 81 and 82:
Section 3: Power Plant Developments
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Section 4: SCLA Hangar Development
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Section 5: SCLAA Bond Expenditures
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118: Section 5: SCLAA Bond Expenditures
Page 123 and 124: 2011-2012 San Bernardino County Gra
Page 125 and 126: COUNTY COMMITTEE Back row: Darrell
Page 127 and 128: 2011‐2012 San Bernardino County G
Page 141 and 142: HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE Back row:
Page 147 and 148: LAW AND JUSTICE COMMITTEE COUNTY OF
Page 167: 2011‐2012 San Bernardino County G
Page 211 and 212: RESPONSE ACCOUNTABILITY COUNTY OF S
Page 219 and 220:
2011-2012 San Bernardino County Gra
show all

FINAL REPORT - San Bernardino Superior Court

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?