FINAL REPORT - San Bernardino Superior Court

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2011‐2012 San Bernardino County Grand Jury Final Report DETENTION CENTERS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF/ CORONER DEPARTMENT BACKGROUND There are four adult detention centers within the County of San Bernardino. They are as follows: Adelanto Detention Center Central Detention Center Glen Helen Rehabilitation Center West Valley Detention Center The Grand Jury, per Penal Code 919(b), is “required to inspect public prisons within the County” during each term. Each of the County adult facilities has been designated by the California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 15 as a Type II facility, which means “a local detention facility used for the detention of persons pending arraignment, during trial, and upon a sentence of commitment.” The State of California, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Corrections Standards Authority conducts biennial inspections of the adult detention facilities for compliance with the minimum standards as outlined in CCR Titles 15 and 24. The state inspection is in conjunction with the annual inspections and reports of the San Bernardino County Health Officer and State Fire Marshal. The most recent state inspection, per Penal Code Section 6031 was dated July 14, 2011, and covered inspections conducted April 5 - 13, 2011. The results of the inspections indicated no issues of non-compliance for the Adelanto and West Valley Detention Centers. However, the inspection report noted that the Glen Helen Rehabilitation Center had “an excess number of occupied beds in several areas of the facility” that led to a finding of non-compliance with CCR Title 24, Section 2.8 Dormitories. The Central Detention Center was also found to have exceeded the rated capacity on the day of inspection, which indicated a non-compliance with CCR Title 24, Section 8227 and 2.8 (Multiple Occupancy Cell and Dormitories). The deficiencies were corrected and reported to the State by September 2011. The Grand Jury developed an extensive inspection survey report to be used for conducting the on-site inspections of the detention centers. The inspection reports of Adelanto and Central Detention Centers and Glen Helen Rehabilitation Center are incorporated herein. CONCLUSION The Grand Jury was impressed with the over-all cleanliness of each of the facilities and the professionalism demonstrated by all personnel during each site visit and/or follow-up. At the Glen Helen Rehabilitation Center it was noted that the use of female inmates to handle the call- 32
2011‐2012 San Bernardino County Grand Jury Final Report center for inmate visitation requests at all facilities is both cost efficient and a valuable source for skill development. Also, the use of the Glen Helen kitchen and bakery facilities to prepare all meals and baked goods at one location for all the adult detention centers is a superb training opportunity for inmates, as well as a cost benefit to the detention centers. 33
Page 1 and 2:
FINAL REPORT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDI
Page 3 and 4:
EDITORIAL COMMITTEE From left to ri
Page 5 and 6:
Honorable Ronald M. Christianson, P
Page 7 and 8:
2011-2012 GRAND JURY SAN BERNARDINO
Page 9 and 10:
TABLE OF CONTENTS 2011-2012 GRAND J
Page 11 and 12:
CITIES/SPECIAL DISTRICTS COMMITTEE
Page 13 and 14:
2011‐2012 San Bernardino County G
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
May 15, 2012 Ted Burgnon, Foreman a
Page 25 and 26:
Executive Summary Harvey M. Rose As
Page 27 and 28:
Executive Summary year to prevent b
Page 29 and 30:
Executive Summary never completed a
Page 31 and 32:
Executive Summary purposes that dir
Page 33 and 34:
Introduction Harvey M. Rose Associa
Page 35 and 36:
Introduction Victorville was establ
Page 37 and 38:
Introduction Exhibit 1 City of Vict
Page 39 and 40:
Introduction boundaries of the Vict
Page 41 and 42:
Introduction The SCLAA operated und
Page 43 and 44:
Section 1: Financial Condition In t
Page 45 and 46:
Section 1: Financial Condition Tabl
Page 47 and 48:
Section 1: Financial Condition Cash
Page 49 and 50:
Section 1: Financial Condition Char
Page 51 and 52:
Section 1: Financial Condition has
Page 53 and 54:
Section 1: Financial Condition Char
Page 55 and 56:
Section 1: Financial Condition City
Page 57 and 58:
Section 1: Financial Condition Impa
Page 59 and 60:
Section 1: Financial Condition Tabl
Page 61 and 62:
Section 1: Financial Condition Reco
Page 63 and 64:
Section 2: Inter-fund Loans and Use
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
3. Power Plant Developments Th
Page 81 and 82:
Section 3: Power Plant Developments
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100: Section 4: SCLA Hangar Development
Page 111 and 112: Section 5: SCLAA Bond Expenditures
Page 123 and 124: 2011-2012 San Bernardino County Gra
Page 125 and 126: COUNTY COMMITTEE Back row: Darrell
Page 127 and 128: 2011‐2012 San Bernardino County G
Page 141 and 142: HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE Back row:
Page 147 and 148: LAW AND JUSTICE COMMITTEE COUNTY OF
Page 149: 2011‐2012 San Bernardino County G
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
RESPONSE ACCOUNTABILITY COUNTY OF S
Page 213 and 214:
2011-2012 San Bernardino County Gra
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
show all

FINAL REPORT - San Bernardino Superior Court

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?