11.07.2014 Views

(BRAVO) Study: Final Report. - Desert Research Institute

(BRAVO) Study: Final Report. - Desert Research Institute

(BRAVO) Study: Final Report. - Desert Research Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Final</strong> <strong>Report</strong> — September 2004<br />

Performance statistics for the same data at all three locations individually are given in<br />

Table 9-12. Definitions of those statistics, which are used in this report for describing both<br />

REMSAD and CMAQ performance, are given in Table 9-13. In Table 9-12, note that the<br />

San Vicente and K-Bar sites, which are approximately 30 km apart, fall within the same<br />

REMSAD 36 km grid cell, and hence the modeled concentrations for these two sites will be<br />

the same, even though the measured concentrations at the two locations may differ. The<br />

averages in Table 9-12 show small differences, though, because differing numbers of valid<br />

measurement samples dictate different numbers of both measured and corresponding<br />

modeled daily values for each location and for each variable. Also, the observed total sulfur<br />

calculation requires concentrations of both SO 2 and sulfate, and thus encompasses fewer days<br />

than either of these components.<br />

Table 9-12. Performance statistics over the full <strong>BRAVO</strong> <strong>Study</strong> period for REMSAD simulations of<br />

SO 2 , sulfate, and total sulfur at the three sampling locations within Big Bend National Park.<br />

K-Bar San Vicente Persimmon Gap<br />

SO2 SO4 = TS SO2 SO4 = TS SO2 SO4 = TS<br />

Avg. Observed (ug/m 3 ) 0.69 2.47 1.19 0.60 2.59 1.19 1.43 2.71 1.63<br />

Avg. Simulated (paired) (ug/m 3 ) 1.84 2.02 1.69 1.75 2.05 1.66 2.00 2.30 1.80<br />

r 2 0.09 0.25 0.31 0.12 0.27 0.34 0.15 0.25 0.29<br />

Regression Slope 0.47 0.48 0.61 0.51 0.50 0.66 0.31 0.51 0.50<br />

Intercept (ug/m 3 ) 1.52 0.83 0.96 1.45 0.75 0.88 1.56 0.91 0.99<br />

Mean Normalized Error (%) 357 62 106 413 59 103 200 56 62<br />

Mean Normalized Bias (%) 352 1 91 404 -5 86 186 1 40<br />

Fractional Error (%) 99 60 57 112 59 57 71 52 42<br />

Fractional Bias (%) 92 -28 38 102 -32 35 53 -24 16<br />

Table 9-12 shows a tendency for REMSAD to overstate SO 2 concentrations at K-Bar<br />

and San Vicente, with very large mean normalized biases of 352 and 404%, respectively (i.e.,<br />

on average, REMSAD overestimates the measured SO 2 concentrations at these two locations<br />

by roughly a factor of five). The average bias is less, but still large, at Persimmon Gap,<br />

where the mean normalized bias is 186%. The coefficient of determination (r 2 ) between<br />

measured and modeled SO 2 concentrations is uniformly low at these sites, ranging between<br />

0.09 and 0.15.<br />

9-40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!