11.07.2014 Views

(BRAVO) Study: Final Report. - Desert Research Institute

(BRAVO) Study: Final Report. - Desert Research Institute

(BRAVO) Study: Final Report. - Desert Research Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Final</strong> <strong>Report</strong> — September 2004<br />

9.11.2 Base Case Performance<br />

Focusing now solely on the new base case configuration, Table 9-18 shows statistics<br />

illustrating the performance of the CMAQ-MADRID base case simulation in simulating<br />

24-hr fine particulate matter component concentrations at the K-Bar site.<br />

As indicated by the coefficient of determination (r 2 ), the model accounts for 52% of<br />

the variance in fine sulfate mass and only 23% of the variance in total fine particulate mass at<br />

Big Bend. The mean normalized error in the predictions for all species is greater than 50%;<br />

however, the mean normalized error is species-dependent and ranges from 51% and 55% for<br />

ammonium and sulfate to 96% for nitrate at the K-Bar site.<br />

Model performance over multiple monitoring locations in the <strong>BRAVO</strong> <strong>Study</strong> network<br />

is summarized in Table 9-19. Note that the number of monitoring locations differed for<br />

different components. (Ammonium and nitrate concentrations were measured only at Big<br />

Bend and thus are not included in this table.)<br />

Thirty-seven stations measured fine sulfate and total fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ).<br />

Consistent with the behavior at Big Bend, Table 9-19 shows that the model exhibited positive<br />

bias (both absolute and relative) in its predictions of fine particulate sulfate, together with<br />

negative absolute bias and positive normalized (relative) bias in its predictions of total fine<br />

particulate mass.<br />

Table 9-18. CMAQ-MADRID performance for 24-hr averages of particulate matter components at<br />

K-Bar over the duration of the <strong>BRAVO</strong> study. 2<br />

Statistic units SO4 2– NO3 – NH4 + EC OM PM2.5<br />

Observed mean µg/m 3 2.49 0.23 0.82 0.23 1.25 6.33<br />

Simulated mean µg/m 3 2.61 0.03 0.7 0.05 0.45 4.61<br />

Coeff. of determination (r 2 ) 0.52 0.01 0.47 0.13 0.1 0.23<br />

Mean bias µg/m 3 0.12 -0.19 -0.12 -0.18 -0.8 -1.72<br />

Mean error µg/m 3 1.08 0.21 0.35 0.18 0.81 3.09<br />

Mean Normalized Bias % 20 -79 7 -76 -59 7<br />

Mean Normalized Error % 55 96 51 76 62 70<br />

Fractional Bias % 0 -166 -12 -135 -98 -31<br />

Fractional Error % 46 173 48 135 100 62<br />

RMS error µg/m 3 1.51 0.24 0.45 0.14 1.08 4.05<br />

2 A threshold of 0.1 µg/m 3 was used for all species in such statistical tables throughout this section,<br />

except for Table 9-22.<br />

9-53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!