(BRAVO) Study: Final Report. - Desert Research Institute
(BRAVO) Study: Final Report. - Desert Research Institute
(BRAVO) Study: Final Report. - Desert Research Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Final</strong> <strong>Report</strong> — September 2004<br />
Table 10-2 suggests that Factor 1 is related to crustal or soil elements. Factor 1<br />
accounted for approximately 57 percent of the variance. The top 50 loadings of this factor<br />
occur in the southern part of Texas, as shown in Figure 10-1. Factor 2 accounted for about<br />
30 percent of the total variance. Factor 2 suggests a relationship to coal burning due to the<br />
combination of sulfur (S) and hydrogen (H) and the tracer selenium (Se). The top 50<br />
loadings of this factor occur in eastern Texas, with the highest factor scores near the Texas-<br />
Louisiana border, as shown in Figure 10-2. Factor 3 was an undetermined factor that<br />
accounted for about 7 percent of the total variance. Most of the top 50 loadings of Factor 3<br />
were concentrated in southeastern Texas. Factor 4 suggests smelter influence with the<br />
combination of copper (Cu), zinc (Zn) and lead (Pb). It accounted for just under 5 percent of<br />
the total variance. The top 50 loadings of this factor were distributed throughout the study<br />
area, as shown in Figure 10-4.<br />
Turning now to the Big Bend data set, the most significant components of the five<br />
factors (labeled BB1 through BB5) are displayed in Table 10-3. (Compare these factors with<br />
very similar ones that were displayed in Table 6-3. There are minor differences because the<br />
data set used for the factor analyses of Table 6-3 included both 6-hr and 24-hr samples, while<br />
the data set for Table 10-3 included only 24-hr samples.) The selection criterion was again<br />
that the absolute value of the factor loading corresponding to a component was greater than<br />
0.3. Note that the loading for vanadium in Factor BB5 was a negative -0.44.<br />
Table 10-3. Components with the most significant factor loadings for each factor of the Big Bend<br />
data set.<br />
Factor BB1 Factor BB2 Factor BB3 Factor BB4 Factor BB5<br />
Al, Si, K, Ca, Ti, V, Mn,<br />
Fe, Rb, Sr, NO3 – , Na + ,<br />
Mg 2+ , Ca 2+ , O1<br />
H, S, Zn, As, Se, Br,<br />
SO4 2- , NH4 + , O3,<br />
O4, OP, E1<br />
Zn, Pb, Br, NO3 – ,<br />
K + , Ca 2+ , O3, O4,<br />
E1<br />
O1, O2, O3, OP,<br />
E1, E2, E3<br />
Na, V*, NO3 – , Na +<br />
*The factor loading for<br />
V is negative.<br />
Table 10-3 suggests that Factor BB1 was most likely associated with soil, with the<br />
most prominent factor loadings (>0.60) coming from elements such as aluminum (Al),<br />
silicon (Si), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), titanium (Ti), manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), rubidium<br />
(Rb), strontium (Sr), and the magnesium ion (Mg 2+ ). Other variables with significant<br />
loadings on this factor were vanadium (V), nitrate (NO 3 ), the sodium ion (Na + ), and one of<br />
the organic carbon groups, O1. Factor BB1 accounted for 39 percent of the total variance.<br />
Factor BB2, which explained 27 percent of the variance, was sulfate-related, with the<br />
heaviest loadings (>0.90) coming from sulfur (S), hydrogen (H), sulfate (SO 4 ), and ammonia<br />
(NH 4 ). Other important variables loading on this factor were selenium (Se), bromine (Br),<br />
organic carbon groups O2 and O4, and elemental carbon group E1. The inclusion of<br />
selenium suggests this second factor could be associated with coal combustion, a primary<br />
source of emissions that lead to the formation of sulfates, while the presence of organic<br />
carbon fractions implies that another source category may also be involved.<br />
10-6