John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of
John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of
John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
96 5 The tangent space<br />
The matrices X satisfying X + X T = 0 are called skew-symmetric, because<br />
the reflection <strong>of</strong> each entry in the diagonal is its negative. That is,<br />
x ji = −x ij . In particular, all the diagonal elements <strong>of</strong> a skew-symmetric<br />
matrix are 0. Matrices X satisfying X +X T = 0 are called skew-Hermitian.<br />
Their entries satisfy x ji = −x ij and their diagonal elements are pure imaginary.<br />
It turns out that all skew-symmetric n × n real matrices are tangent,<br />
not only to O(n), but also to SO(n) at 1. To prove this we use the matrix<br />
exponential function from Section 4.5, showing that e X ∈ SO(n) for any<br />
skew-symmetric X, in which case X is tangent to the smooth path e tX in<br />
SO(n).<br />
Exercises<br />
To appreciate why smooth paths are better than mere paths, consider the following<br />
example.<br />
5.1.1 Interpret the paths B(t) and C(t) above as paths on the unit circle, say for<br />
−π/2 ≤ t ≤ π/2.<br />
5.1.2 If B(t) or C(t) is interpreted as the position <strong>of</strong> a point at time t, how does<br />
the motion described by B(t) differ from the motion described by C(t)?<br />
5.2 The tangent space <strong>of</strong> SO(n)<br />
In this section we return to the addition formula <strong>of</strong> the exponential function<br />
e A+B = e A e B when AB = BA,<br />
which was previously set as a series <strong>of</strong> exercises in Section 4.1. This formula<br />
can be proved by observing the nature <strong>of</strong> the calculation involved,<br />
without actually doing any calculation. The argument goes as follows.<br />
According to the definition <strong>of</strong> the exponential function, we want to<br />
prove that<br />
(<br />
1 + A + B<br />
1!<br />
(A + B)n<br />
+ ···+<br />
n!<br />
=<br />
(1 + A 1!<br />
)<br />
+ ···<br />
···)(<br />
An<br />
+ ···+<br />
n! + 1 + B ···)<br />
Bn<br />
+ ···+<br />
1! n! + .<br />
This could be done by expanding both sides and showing that the coefficient<br />
<strong>of</strong> A l B m is the same on both sides. But if AB = BA the calculation