18.07.2014 Views

John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of

John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of

John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

96 5 The tangent space<br />

The matrices X satisfying X + X T = 0 are called skew-symmetric, because<br />

the reflection <strong>of</strong> each entry in the diagonal is its negative. That is,<br />

x ji = −x ij . In particular, all the diagonal elements <strong>of</strong> a skew-symmetric<br />

matrix are 0. Matrices X satisfying X +X T = 0 are called skew-Hermitian.<br />

Their entries satisfy x ji = −x ij and their diagonal elements are pure imaginary.<br />

It turns out that all skew-symmetric n × n real matrices are tangent,<br />

not only to O(n), but also to SO(n) at 1. To prove this we use the matrix<br />

exponential function from Section 4.5, showing that e X ∈ SO(n) for any<br />

skew-symmetric X, in which case X is tangent to the smooth path e tX in<br />

SO(n).<br />

Exercises<br />

To appreciate why smooth paths are better than mere paths, consider the following<br />

example.<br />

5.1.1 Interpret the paths B(t) and C(t) above as paths on the unit circle, say for<br />

−π/2 ≤ t ≤ π/2.<br />

5.1.2 If B(t) or C(t) is interpreted as the position <strong>of</strong> a point at time t, how does<br />

the motion described by B(t) differ from the motion described by C(t)?<br />

5.2 The tangent space <strong>of</strong> SO(n)<br />

In this section we return to the addition formula <strong>of</strong> the exponential function<br />

e A+B = e A e B when AB = BA,<br />

which was previously set as a series <strong>of</strong> exercises in Section 4.1. This formula<br />

can be proved by observing the nature <strong>of</strong> the calculation involved,<br />

without actually doing any calculation. The argument goes as follows.<br />

According to the definition <strong>of</strong> the exponential function, we want to<br />

prove that<br />

(<br />

1 + A + B<br />

1!<br />

(A + B)n<br />

+ ···+<br />

n!<br />

=<br />

(1 + A 1!<br />

)<br />

+ ···<br />

···)(<br />

An<br />

+ ···+<br />

n! + 1 + B ···)<br />

Bn<br />

+ ···+<br />

1! n! + .<br />

This could be done by expanding both sides and showing that the coefficient<br />

<strong>of</strong> A l B m is the same on both sides. But if AB = BA the calculation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!