18.07.2014 Views

John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of

John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of

John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.1 Normal subgroups and ideals 117<br />

6.1 Normal subgroups and ideals<br />

In Chapter 5 we found the tangent spaces <strong>of</strong> the classical <strong>Lie</strong> groups: the<br />

classical <strong>Lie</strong> algebras. In this chapter we use the tangent spaces to find<br />

candidates for simplicity among the classical <strong>Lie</strong> groups G. Wedosoby<br />

finding substructures <strong>of</strong> the tangent space g that are tangent spaces <strong>of</strong> the<br />

normal subgroups <strong>of</strong> G. These are the ideals, 4 defined as follows.<br />

Definition. An ideal h <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Lie</strong> algebra g is a subspace <strong>of</strong> g closed under<br />

<strong>Lie</strong> brackets with arbitrary members <strong>of</strong> g. Thatis,ifY ∈ h and X ∈ g then<br />

[X,Y ] ∈ h.<br />

Then the relationship between normal subgroups and ideals is given by<br />

the following theorem.<br />

Tangent space <strong>of</strong> a normal subgroup. If H is a normal subgroup <strong>of</strong> a<br />

matrix <strong>Lie</strong> group G, then T 1 (H) is an ideal <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Lie</strong> algebra T 1 (G).<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong>. T 1 (H) is a vector space, like any tangent space, and it is a subspace<br />

<strong>of</strong> T 1 (G) because any tangent to H at 1 is a tangent to G at 1. Thus it<br />

remains to show that T 1 (H) is closed under <strong>Lie</strong> brackets with members <strong>of</strong><br />

T 1 (G). To do this we use the property <strong>of</strong> a normal subgroup that B ∈ H and<br />

A ∈ G implies ABA −1 ∈ H.<br />

It follows that A(s)B(t)A(s) −1 isasmoothpathinH for any smooth<br />

paths A(s) in G and B(t) in H. As usual, we suppose A(0)=1 = B(0), so<br />

A ′ (0)=X ∈ T 1 (G) and B ′ (0)=Y ∈ T 1 (H). Ifwelet<br />

then it follows as in Section 5.4 that<br />

C s (t)=A(s)B(t)A(s) −1 ,<br />

D(s)=C ′ s(0)=A(s)YA(s) −1<br />

4 This terminology comes from algebraic number theory, via ring theory. In the 1840s,<br />

Kummer introduced some objects he called “ideal numbers” and “ideal primes” in order to<br />

restore unique prime factorization in certain systems <strong>of</strong> algebraic numbers where ordinary<br />

prime factorization is not unique. Kummer’s “ideal numbers” did not have a clear meaning<br />

at first, but in 1871 Dedekind gave them a concrete interpretation as certain sets <strong>of</strong> numbers<br />

closed under sums, and closed under products with all numbers in the system. In the 1920s,<br />

Emmy Noether carried the concept <strong>of</strong> ideal to general ring theory. Roughly speaking, a<br />

ring is a set <strong>of</strong> objects with sum and product operations. The sum operation satisfies the<br />

usual properties <strong>of</strong> sum (commutative, associative, etc.) but the product is required only<br />

to “distribute” over sum: a(b + c) =ab + ac. A <strong>Lie</strong> algebra is a ring in this general sense<br />

(with the <strong>Lie</strong> bracket as the “product” operation), so <strong>Lie</strong> algebra ideals are included in the<br />

general concept <strong>of</strong> ideal.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!