John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of
John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of
John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
7.4 The log function into the tangent space 149<br />
so they sum to zero. (I thank Brian Hall for this observation.) Therefore,<br />
T m − 1 Y m<br />
lim = lim<br />
m→∞ |Y m | m→∞ |Y m | = Y.<br />
Since each T m ∈ G, it follows that the sequential tangent<br />
T m − 1<br />
lim = Y<br />
m→∞ |Y m |<br />
is in T 1 (G) by the smoothness <strong>of</strong> sequential tangents proved in Section 7.3.<br />
But Y ∉ T 1 (G), as observed above. This contradiction shows that our<br />
original assumption was false, so there is a neighborhood N δ (1) mapped<br />
into T 1 (G) by log.<br />
□<br />
Corollary. The log function gives a bijection, continuous in both directions,<br />
between N δ (1) in G and logN δ (1) in T 1 (G).<br />
Pro<strong>of</strong>. The continuity <strong>of</strong> log, and <strong>of</strong> its inverse function exp, shows that<br />
there is a 1-to-1 correspondence, continuous in both directions, between<br />
N δ (1) and its image logN δ (1) in T 1 (G).<br />
□<br />
If N δ (1) in G is mapped into T 1 (G) by log, then each A ∈ N δ (1) has the<br />
form A = e X ,whereX = logA ∈ T 1 (G). Thus the paradise <strong>of</strong> SO(2) and<br />
SU(2)—where each group element is the exponential <strong>of</strong> a tangent vector—<br />
is partly regained by the theorem above. Any matrix <strong>Lie</strong> group G has at<br />
least a neighborhood <strong>of</strong> 1 in which each element is the exponential <strong>of</strong> a<br />
tangent vector.<br />
The corollary tells us that the set log N δ (1) is a “neighborhood” <strong>of</strong> 0<br />
in T 1 (G) in a more general sense—the topological sense—that we will<br />
discuss in Chapter 8. The existence <strong>of</strong> this continuous bijection between<br />
neighborhoods finally establishes that G has a topological dimension equal<br />
to the real vector space dimension <strong>of</strong> T 1 (G), thanks to the deep theorem<br />
<strong>of</strong> Brouwer [1911] on the invariance <strong>of</strong> topological dimension. This gives<br />
a broad justification for the <strong>Lie</strong> theory convention, already mentioned in<br />
Section 5.5, <strong>of</strong> defining the dimension <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Lie</strong> group to be the dimension<br />
<strong>of</strong> its <strong>Lie</strong> algebra. In practice, arguments about dimension are made at the<br />
<strong>Lie</strong> algebra level, where we can use linear algebra, so we will not actually<br />
need the topological concept <strong>of</strong> dimension.<br />
Exercises<br />
The continuous bijection between neighborhoods <strong>of</strong> 1 in G and <strong>of</strong> 0 in T 1 (G)<br />
enables us to show the existence <strong>of</strong> nth roots in a matrix <strong>Lie</strong> group.