18.07.2014 Views

John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of

John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of

John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

202 9 Simply connected <strong>Lie</strong> groups<br />

<strong>Lie</strong> group G. This result strongly constrains the topology <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lie</strong> groups,<br />

because the fundamental group <strong>of</strong> an arbitrary smooth manifold can be any<br />

finitely presented group. A “random” smooth manifold has a nonabelian<br />

fundamental group.<br />

Like the quotient construction (see Section 3.9), the universal covering<br />

can produce a nonmatrix group ˜G from a matrix group G. A famous<br />

example, essentially due to Cartan [1936], is the universal covering group<br />

˜ SL(2,C) <strong>of</strong> the matrix group SL(2,C). Thus topology provides another<br />

path to the world <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lie</strong> groups beyond the matrix groups.<br />

Topology makes up the information lost when we pass from <strong>Lie</strong> groups<br />

to <strong>Lie</strong> algebras, and in fact topology makes it possible to bypass <strong>Lie</strong> algebras<br />

almost entirely. A notable book that conducts <strong>Lie</strong> theory at the group<br />

level is Adams [1969], by the topologist J. Frank Adams. It should be said,<br />

however, that Adams’s approach uses topology that is more sophisticated<br />

than the topology used in this chapter.<br />

Finite simple groups<br />

The classification <strong>of</strong> simple <strong>Lie</strong> groups by Killing and Cartan is a remarkable<br />

fact in itself, but even more remarkable is that it paves the way for the<br />

classification <strong>of</strong> finite simple groups—a much harder problem, but one that<br />

is related to the classification <strong>of</strong> continuous groups. Surprisingly, there are<br />

finite analogues <strong>of</strong> continuous groups in which the role <strong>of</strong> R or C is played<br />

by finite fields. 11<br />

As mentioned in Section 2.8, finite simple groups were discovered by<br />

Galois around 1830 as a key concept for understanding unsolvability in the<br />

theory <strong>of</strong> equations. Galois explained solution <strong>of</strong> equations by radicals as a<br />

process <strong>of</strong> “symmetry breaking” that begins with the group <strong>of</strong> all symmetries<br />

<strong>of</strong> the roots and factors it into smaller groups by taking square roots,<br />

cube roots, and so on. The process first fails with the general quintic equation,<br />

where the symmetry group is S 5 , the group <strong>of</strong> all 120 permutations <strong>of</strong><br />

five things. The group S 5 may be factored down to the group A 5 <strong>of</strong> the 60<br />

even permutations <strong>of</strong> five things by taking a suitable square root, but it is<br />

not possible to proceed further because A 5 is a simple group.<br />

More generally, A n is simple for n > 5, so Galois had in fact discovered<br />

an infinite family <strong>of</strong> finite simple groups. Apart from the infinite family <strong>of</strong><br />

11 This brings to mind a quote attributed to Stan Ulam: The infinite we can do right away,<br />

the finite will take a little longer.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!