John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of
John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of
John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
202 9 Simply connected <strong>Lie</strong> groups<br />
<strong>Lie</strong> group G. This result strongly constrains the topology <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lie</strong> groups,<br />
because the fundamental group <strong>of</strong> an arbitrary smooth manifold can be any<br />
finitely presented group. A “random” smooth manifold has a nonabelian<br />
fundamental group.<br />
Like the quotient construction (see Section 3.9), the universal covering<br />
can produce a nonmatrix group ˜G from a matrix group G. A famous<br />
example, essentially due to Cartan [1936], is the universal covering group<br />
˜ SL(2,C) <strong>of</strong> the matrix group SL(2,C). Thus topology provides another<br />
path to the world <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lie</strong> groups beyond the matrix groups.<br />
Topology makes up the information lost when we pass from <strong>Lie</strong> groups<br />
to <strong>Lie</strong> algebras, and in fact topology makes it possible to bypass <strong>Lie</strong> algebras<br />
almost entirely. A notable book that conducts <strong>Lie</strong> theory at the group<br />
level is Adams [1969], by the topologist J. Frank Adams. It should be said,<br />
however, that Adams’s approach uses topology that is more sophisticated<br />
than the topology used in this chapter.<br />
Finite simple groups<br />
The classification <strong>of</strong> simple <strong>Lie</strong> groups by Killing and Cartan is a remarkable<br />
fact in itself, but even more remarkable is that it paves the way for the<br />
classification <strong>of</strong> finite simple groups—a much harder problem, but one that<br />
is related to the classification <strong>of</strong> continuous groups. Surprisingly, there are<br />
finite analogues <strong>of</strong> continuous groups in which the role <strong>of</strong> R or C is played<br />
by finite fields. 11<br />
As mentioned in Section 2.8, finite simple groups were discovered by<br />
Galois around 1830 as a key concept for understanding unsolvability in the<br />
theory <strong>of</strong> equations. Galois explained solution <strong>of</strong> equations by radicals as a<br />
process <strong>of</strong> “symmetry breaking” that begins with the group <strong>of</strong> all symmetries<br />
<strong>of</strong> the roots and factors it into smaller groups by taking square roots,<br />
cube roots, and so on. The process first fails with the general quintic equation,<br />
where the symmetry group is S 5 , the group <strong>of</strong> all 120 permutations <strong>of</strong><br />
five things. The group S 5 may be factored down to the group A 5 <strong>of</strong> the 60<br />
even permutations <strong>of</strong> five things by taking a suitable square root, but it is<br />
not possible to proceed further because A 5 is a simple group.<br />
More generally, A n is simple for n > 5, so Galois had in fact discovered<br />
an infinite family <strong>of</strong> finite simple groups. Apart from the infinite family <strong>of</strong><br />
11 This brings to mind a quote attributed to Stan Ulam: The infinite we can do right away,<br />
the finite will take a little longer.