18.07.2014 Views

John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of

John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of

John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6 1 The geometry <strong>of</strong> complex numbers and quaternions<br />

• Therefore, the multiplicative property <strong>of</strong> absolute value, |z 1 z 2 | =<br />

|z 1 ||z 2 |, follows from the multiplicative property <strong>of</strong> determinants,<br />

det(A 1 A 2 )=det(A 1 )det(A 2 ).<br />

(Take A 1 as the matrix representing z 1 ,andA 2 as the matrix representing<br />

z 2 .)<br />

• The inverse z −1 = a−bi <strong>of</strong> z = a + bi ≠ 0 corresponds to the inverse<br />

a 2 +b 2<br />

matrix ( ) −1 a −b<br />

= 1 ( ) a b<br />

b a a 2 + b 2 .<br />

−b a<br />

The two-square identity<br />

If we set z 1 = a 1 + ib 1 and z 2 = a 2 + ib 2 , then the multiplicative property<br />

<strong>of</strong> (squared) absolute value states that<br />

(a 2 1 + b2 1 )(a2 2 + b2 2 )=(a 1a 2 − b 1 b 2 ) 2 +(a 1 b 2 + a 2 b 1 ) 2 ,<br />

as can be checked by working out the product z 1 z 2 and its squared absolute<br />

value. This identity is particularly interesting in the case <strong>of</strong> integers<br />

a 1 ,b 1 ,a 2 ,b 2 , because it says that<br />

(a sum <strong>of</strong> two squares) ×(a sum <strong>of</strong> two squares) = (a sum <strong>of</strong> two squares).<br />

This fact was noticed nearly 2000 years ago by Diophantus, who mentioned<br />

an instance <strong>of</strong> it in Book III, Problem 19, <strong>of</strong> his Arithmetica. However,<br />

Diophantus said nothing about sums <strong>of</strong> three squares—with good reason,<br />

because there is no such three-square identity. For example<br />

(1 2 + 1 2 + 1 2 )(0 2 + 1 2 + 2 2 )=3 × 5 = 15,<br />

and15isnot a sum <strong>of</strong> three integer squares.<br />

This is an early warning sign that there are no three-dimensional numbers.<br />

In fact, there are no n-dimensional numbers for any n > 2; however,<br />

there is a “near miss” for n = 4. One can define “addition” and “multiplication”<br />

for quadruples q =(a,b,c,d) <strong>of</strong> real numbers so as to satisfy all<br />

the basic laws <strong>of</strong> arithmetic except q 1 q 2 = q 2 q 1 (the commutative law <strong>of</strong><br />

multiplication). This system <strong>of</strong> arithmetic for quadruples is the quaternion<br />

algebra that we introduce in the next section.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!