18.07.2014 Views

John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of

John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of

John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6<br />

Structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lie</strong> algebras<br />

PREVIEW<br />

In this chapter we return to our original motive for studying <strong>Lie</strong> algebras:<br />

to understand the structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lie</strong> groups. We saw in Chapter 2 how normal<br />

subgroups help to reveal the structure <strong>of</strong> the groups SO(3) and SO(4). To<br />

go further, we need to know exactly how the normal subgroups <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Lie</strong><br />

group G are reflected in the structure <strong>of</strong> its <strong>Lie</strong> algebra g.<br />

The focus <strong>of</strong> attention shifts from groups to algebras with the following<br />

discovery. The tangent map from a <strong>Lie</strong> group G to its <strong>Lie</strong> algebra g sends<br />

normal subgroups <strong>of</strong> G to substructures <strong>of</strong> g called ideals. Thus the ideals<br />

<strong>of</strong> g “detect” normal subgroups <strong>of</strong> G in the sense that a nontrivial ideal <strong>of</strong><br />

g implies a nontrivial normal subgroup <strong>of</strong> G.<br />

<strong>Lie</strong> algebras with no nontrivial ideals, like groups with no nontrivial<br />

normal subgroups, are called simple. It is not quite true that simplicity <strong>of</strong><br />

g implies simplicity <strong>of</strong> G, but it turns out to be easier to recognize simple<br />

<strong>Lie</strong> algebras, so we consider that problem first.<br />

We prove simplicity for the “generalized rotation” <strong>Lie</strong> algebras so(n)<br />

for n > 4, su(n), sp(n), and also for the <strong>Lie</strong> algebra <strong>of</strong> the special linear<br />

group <strong>of</strong> C n . The pro<strong>of</strong>s occupy quite a few pages, but they are all variations<br />

on the same elementary argument. It may help to skip the details<br />

(which are only matrix computations) at first reading.<br />

116 J. <strong>Stillwell</strong>, <strong>Naive</strong> <strong>Lie</strong> <strong>Theory</strong>, DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-78214-0 6,<br />

c○ Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!