18.07.2014 Views

John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of

John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of

John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8.8 Discussion 183<br />

existence <strong>of</strong> a tangent space at the identity (and hence at every point) for<br />

each matrix <strong>Lie</strong> group G. As we saw in Chapter 7, every matrix <strong>Lie</strong> group<br />

G has a tangent space T 1 (G) at the identity, and T 1 (G) equals some R k .<br />

Even finite groups, such as G = {1}, have a tangent space at the identity;<br />

not surprisingly it is the space R 0 .<br />

Topology gives a way to describe all the matrix <strong>Lie</strong> groups with zero<br />

tangent space: they are the discrete groups, where a group H is called<br />

discrete if there is a neighborhood <strong>of</strong> 1 not containing any elements <strong>of</strong> G<br />

except 1 itself. Every finite group is obviously discrete, but there are also<br />

infinite discrete groups; for example, Z is a discrete subgroup <strong>of</strong> R. The<br />

groups Z and R can be viewed as matrix groups by associating each x ∈ R<br />

with the matrix ( 1 x<br />

01)<br />

(because multiplying two such matrices results in<br />

addition <strong>of</strong> their x entries).<br />

It follows immediately from the definition <strong>of</strong> discreteness that T 1 (H)=<br />

{0} for a discrete group H. It also follows that if H is a discrete subgroup<br />

<strong>of</strong> a matrix <strong>Lie</strong> group G then G/H is “locally isomorphic” to G in some<br />

neighborhood <strong>of</strong> 1. This is because every element <strong>of</strong> G in some neighborhood<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1 belongs to a different coset. From this we conclude that G/H<br />

and G have the same tangent space at 1, and hence the same <strong>Lie</strong> algebra.<br />

This result shows, once again, why <strong>Lie</strong> algebras are simpler than <strong>Lie</strong><br />

groups—they do not “see” discrete subgroups.<br />

Apart from the existence <strong>of</strong> a tangent space, there is an algebraic reason<br />

for including the discrete matrix groups among the matrix <strong>Lie</strong> groups: they<br />

occur as kernels <strong>of</strong> “<strong>Lie</strong> homomorphisms.” Since everything in <strong>Lie</strong> theory<br />

is supposed to be smooth, the only homomorphisms between <strong>Lie</strong> groups<br />

that belong to <strong>Lie</strong> theory are the smooth ones. We will not attempt a general<br />

definition <strong>of</strong> smooth homomorphism here, but merely give an example: the<br />

map Φ : R → S 1 defined by<br />

Φ(θ)=e iθ .<br />

This is surely a smooth map because Φ is a differentiable function <strong>of</strong> θ.<br />

The kernel <strong>of</strong> this Φ is the discrete subgroup <strong>of</strong> R (isomorphic to Z) consisting<br />

<strong>of</strong> the integer multiples <strong>of</strong> 2π. We would like any natural aspect <strong>of</strong> a<br />

<strong>Lie</strong> “thing” to be another <strong>Lie</strong> “thing,” so the kernel <strong>of</strong> a smooth homomorphism<br />

ought to be a <strong>Lie</strong> group. This is an algebraic reason for considering<br />

the discrete group Z to be a <strong>Lie</strong> group.<br />

The concepts <strong>of</strong> compactness, path-connectedness, simple connectedness,<br />

and coverings play a fundamental role in topology, as a glance at any

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!