John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of
John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of
John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
8.8 Discussion 183<br />
existence <strong>of</strong> a tangent space at the identity (and hence at every point) for<br />
each matrix <strong>Lie</strong> group G. As we saw in Chapter 7, every matrix <strong>Lie</strong> group<br />
G has a tangent space T 1 (G) at the identity, and T 1 (G) equals some R k .<br />
Even finite groups, such as G = {1}, have a tangent space at the identity;<br />
not surprisingly it is the space R 0 .<br />
Topology gives a way to describe all the matrix <strong>Lie</strong> groups with zero<br />
tangent space: they are the discrete groups, where a group H is called<br />
discrete if there is a neighborhood <strong>of</strong> 1 not containing any elements <strong>of</strong> G<br />
except 1 itself. Every finite group is obviously discrete, but there are also<br />
infinite discrete groups; for example, Z is a discrete subgroup <strong>of</strong> R. The<br />
groups Z and R can be viewed as matrix groups by associating each x ∈ R<br />
with the matrix ( 1 x<br />
01)<br />
(because multiplying two such matrices results in<br />
addition <strong>of</strong> their x entries).<br />
It follows immediately from the definition <strong>of</strong> discreteness that T 1 (H)=<br />
{0} for a discrete group H. It also follows that if H is a discrete subgroup<br />
<strong>of</strong> a matrix <strong>Lie</strong> group G then G/H is “locally isomorphic” to G in some<br />
neighborhood <strong>of</strong> 1. This is because every element <strong>of</strong> G in some neighborhood<br />
<strong>of</strong> 1 belongs to a different coset. From this we conclude that G/H<br />
and G have the same tangent space at 1, and hence the same <strong>Lie</strong> algebra.<br />
This result shows, once again, why <strong>Lie</strong> algebras are simpler than <strong>Lie</strong><br />
groups—they do not “see” discrete subgroups.<br />
Apart from the existence <strong>of</strong> a tangent space, there is an algebraic reason<br />
for including the discrete matrix groups among the matrix <strong>Lie</strong> groups: they<br />
occur as kernels <strong>of</strong> “<strong>Lie</strong> homomorphisms.” Since everything in <strong>Lie</strong> theory<br />
is supposed to be smooth, the only homomorphisms between <strong>Lie</strong> groups<br />
that belong to <strong>Lie</strong> theory are the smooth ones. We will not attempt a general<br />
definition <strong>of</strong> smooth homomorphism here, but merely give an example: the<br />
map Φ : R → S 1 defined by<br />
Φ(θ)=e iθ .<br />
This is surely a smooth map because Φ is a differentiable function <strong>of</strong> θ.<br />
The kernel <strong>of</strong> this Φ is the discrete subgroup <strong>of</strong> R (isomorphic to Z) consisting<br />
<strong>of</strong> the integer multiples <strong>of</strong> 2π. We would like any natural aspect <strong>of</strong> a<br />
<strong>Lie</strong> “thing” to be another <strong>Lie</strong> “thing,” so the kernel <strong>of</strong> a smooth homomorphism<br />
ought to be a <strong>Lie</strong> group. This is an algebraic reason for considering<br />
the discrete group Z to be a <strong>Lie</strong> group.<br />
The concepts <strong>of</strong> compactness, path-connectedness, simple connectedness,<br />
and coverings play a fundamental role in topology, as a glance at any