18.07.2014 Views

John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of

John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of

John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.4 Algebraic properties <strong>of</strong> the tangent space 105<br />

Definition. A matrix <strong>Lie</strong> algebra is a vector space <strong>of</strong> matrices that is closed<br />

under the <strong>Lie</strong> bracket [X,Y ]=XY −YX.<br />

All the <strong>Lie</strong> algebras we have seen so far have been matrix <strong>Lie</strong> algebras,<br />

and in fact there is a theorem (Ado’s theorem) saying that every <strong>Lie</strong> algebra<br />

is isomorphic to a matrix <strong>Lie</strong> algebra. Thus it is not wrong to say simply<br />

“<strong>Lie</strong> algebra” rather than “matrix <strong>Lie</strong> algebra,” and we will usually do so.<br />

Perhaps the most important idea in <strong>Lie</strong> theory is to study <strong>Lie</strong> groups<br />

by looking at their <strong>Lie</strong> algebras. This idea succeeds because vector spaces<br />

are generally easier to work with than curved objects—which <strong>Lie</strong> groups<br />

usually are—and the <strong>Lie</strong> bracket captures most <strong>of</strong> the group structure.<br />

However, it should be emphasized at the outset that g does not always<br />

capture G entirely, because different <strong>Lie</strong> groups can have the same <strong>Lie</strong><br />

algebra. We have already seen one class <strong>of</strong> examples. For all n, O(n) is<br />

different from SO(n), but they have the same tangent space at 1 and hence<br />

the same <strong>Lie</strong> algebra. There is a simple geometric reason for this: SO(n)<br />

is the subgroup <strong>of</strong> O(n) whose members are connected by paths to 1. The<br />

tangent space to O(n) at 1 is therefore the tangent space to SO(n) at 1.<br />

Exercises<br />

If, instead <strong>of</strong> considering the path C s (t) =A(s)B(t)A(s) −1 in G we consider the<br />

path<br />

D s (t)=A(s)B(t)A(s) −1 B(t) −1 for some fixed value <strong>of</strong> s,<br />

then we can relate the <strong>Lie</strong> bracket [X,Y] <strong>of</strong> X,Y ∈ T 1 (G) to the so-called commutator<br />

A(s)B(t)A(s) −1 B(t) −1 <strong>of</strong> smooth paths A(s) and B(t) through 1 in G.<br />

5.4.1 Find D ′ s(t), and hence show that D ′ s(0)=A(s)YA(s) −1 −Y.<br />

5.4.2 D ′ s (0) ∈ T 1(G) (why?) and hence, as s varies, we have a smooth path E(s)=<br />

D ′ s(0) in T 1 (G) (why?).<br />

5.4.3 Show that the velocity E ′ (0) equals XY −YX, and explain why E ′ (0) is in<br />

T 1 (G).<br />

The tangent space at 1 is the most natural one to consider, but in fact all<br />

elements <strong>of</strong> G have the “same” tangent space.<br />

5.4.4 Show that the smooth paths through any g ∈ G are <strong>of</strong> the form gA(t),where<br />

A(t) is a smooth path through 1.<br />

5.4.5 Deduce from Exercise 5.4.4 that the space <strong>of</strong> tangents to G at g is isomorphic<br />

to the space <strong>of</strong> tangents to G at 1.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!