John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of
John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of
John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
86 4 The exponential map<br />
Definition. The exponential <strong>of</strong> any n × n matrix A is given by the series<br />
e A = 1 + A 1! + A2<br />
2! + A3<br />
3! + ···.<br />
The matrix exponential function is a generalization <strong>of</strong> the complex and<br />
quaternion exponential functions. We already know that each complex<br />
number z = a + bi can be represented by the 2 × 2 real matrix<br />
( ) a −b<br />
Z = ,<br />
b a<br />
and it is easy to check that e z is represented by e Z . We defined the quaternion<br />
q = a + bi + cj + dk to be the 2 × 2 complex matrix<br />
( )<br />
a + di −b + ci<br />
Q =<br />
,<br />
b + ci a − di<br />
so the exponential <strong>of</strong> a quaternion matrix may be represented by the exponential<br />
<strong>of</strong> a complex matrix.<br />
From now on we will <strong>of</strong>ten denote the exponential function simply by<br />
exp, regardless <strong>of</strong> the type <strong>of</strong> objects being exponentiated.<br />
Exercises<br />
The version <strong>of</strong> the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality used to prove the submultiplicative<br />
property is the real inner product inequality |u · v|≤|u||v|,where<br />
u =(|a i1 |,|a i2 |,...,|a in |) and v = ( |b j1 |,|b j2 |,...,|b jn | ) .<br />
It is probably a good idea for me to review this form <strong>of</strong> Cauchy–Schwarz, since<br />
some readers may not have seen it.<br />
The pro<strong>of</strong> depends on the fact that w · w = |w| 2 ≥ 0 for any real vector w.<br />
4.5.1 Show that 0 ≤ (u + xv) · (u + xv)=|u| 2 + 2(u · v)x + x 2 |v| 2 = q(x), forany<br />
real vectors u, v and real number x.<br />
4.5.2 Use the positivity <strong>of</strong> the quadratic function q(x) found in Exercise 4.5.1 to<br />
deduce that<br />
(2u · v) 2 − 4|u| 2 |v| 2 ≤ 0,<br />
that is, |u · v|≤|u||v|.