John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of
John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of
John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
146 7 The matrix logarithm<br />
If A(t) isasmoothpathinG with A(0)=1, then the sequence <strong>of</strong> points<br />
A m = A(1/m) tends to 1 and<br />
A ′ A m − 1<br />
(0)= lim<br />
m→∞ 1/m ,<br />
so any ordinary tangent vector A ′ (0) is a sequential tangent vector. But<br />
sometimes it is convenient to arrive at tangent vectors via sequences rather<br />
than via smooth paths, so it would be nice to be sure that all sequential<br />
tangent vectors are in fact ordinary tangent vectors. This is confirmed by<br />
the following theorem.<br />
Smoothness <strong>of</strong> sequential tangency. Suppose that 〈A m 〉 is a sequence in<br />
a matrix <strong>Lie</strong> group G such that A m → 1 as m → ∞, and that 〈α m 〉 is a<br />
sequence <strong>of</strong> real numbers such that (A m − 1)/α m → Xasm→ ∞.<br />
Then e tX ∈ G for all real t (and therefore X is the tangent at 1 to the<br />
smooth path e tX ).<br />
A<br />
Pro<strong>of</strong>. Let X = lim m −1<br />
m→∞ α m<br />
. First we prove that e X ∈ G. Then we indicate<br />
how the pro<strong>of</strong> may be modified to show that e tX ∈ G.<br />
Given that (A m − 1)/α m → X as m → ∞, it follows that α m → 0as<br />
A m → 1, and hence 1/α m → ∞. Then if we set<br />
a m = nearest integer to 1/α m ,<br />
we also have a m (A m − 1) → X as m → ∞. Sincea m is an integer,<br />
log(A a m m )=a m log(A m ) by the multiplicative property <strong>of</strong> log<br />
[<br />
Am − 1<br />
= a m (A m − 1) − a m (A m − 1) − (A m − 1) 2 ]<br />
+ ··· .<br />
2 3<br />
And since A m → 1 we can argue as in Section 7.2 that the series in square<br />
brackets tends to zero. Then, since lim m→∞ a m (A m − 1)=X,wehave<br />
X = lim log(A a m<br />
m→∞<br />
m ).<br />
It follows, by the inverse property <strong>of</strong> log and the continuity <strong>of</strong> exp, that<br />
e X = lim A a m<br />
m→∞<br />
m .<br />
Since a m is an integer, A a m m ∈ G by the closure <strong>of</strong> G under products. And<br />
then, by the closure <strong>of</strong> G under nonsingular limits,<br />
e X = lim<br />
m→∞<br />
A a m m ∈ G.