John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of
John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of
John Stillwell - Naive Lie Theory.pdf - Index of
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
7.1 Logarithm and exponential 141<br />
the same terms occur in the expansion <strong>of</strong> log(e x ),when|e x − 1| < 1, and<br />
their sum is zero because log(e x )=x under these conditions.<br />
Thus log(e X )=X as required.<br />
□<br />
The inverse property allows us to derive certain properties <strong>of</strong> the matrix<br />
logarithm from corresponding properties <strong>of</strong> the matrix exponential. For<br />
example:<br />
Multiplicative property <strong>of</strong> matrix logarithm. If AB = BA, and log(A),<br />
log(B), and log(AB) are all defined, then<br />
log(AB)=log(A)+log(B).<br />
Pro<strong>of</strong>. Suppose that log(A)=X and log(B)=Y ,soe X = A and e Y = B by<br />
the inverse property <strong>of</strong> log. Notice that XY = YX because<br />
(A − 1)2 (A − 1)3<br />
X = log(1 +(A − 1)) = (A − 1) − + −···,<br />
2 3<br />
(B − 1)2 (B − 1)3<br />
Y = log(1 +(B − 1)) = (B − 1) − + −···,<br />
2 3<br />
and the series commute because A and B do. Thus it follows from the<br />
addition formula for exp proved in Section 5.2 that<br />
AB = e X e Y = e X+Y .<br />
Taking log <strong>of</strong> both sides <strong>of</strong> this equation, we get<br />
log(AB)=X +Y = log(A)+log(B)<br />
by the inverse property <strong>of</strong> the matrix logarithm again.<br />
Exercises<br />
The log series<br />
log(1 + x)=x − x2<br />
2 + x3<br />
3 − x4<br />
4 + ···<br />
was first published by Nicholas Mercator in a book entitled Logarithmotechnia in<br />
1668. Mercator’s derivation <strong>of</strong> the series was essentially this:<br />
∫ x ∫<br />
dt x<br />
log(1 + x)=<br />
0 1 + t = (1 − t + t 2 − t 3 + ···)dt = x − x2<br />
0<br />
2 + x3<br />
3 − x4<br />
4 + ···.<br />
Isaac Newton discovered the log series at about the same time, but took the idea<br />
further, discovering the inverse relationship with the exponential series as well.<br />
He discovered the exponential series by solving the equation y = log(1 + x) as<br />
follows.<br />
□