28.08.2014 Views

D.H. Lammlein PhD Dissertation - Vanderbilt University

D.H. Lammlein PhD Dissertation - Vanderbilt University

D.H. Lammlein PhD Dissertation - Vanderbilt University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

setting are indicated. Note that strength continues to increase with depth beyond the<br />

matrix depth of 0.10” despite distortion at the base of the joint (see Figure 119 and Figure<br />

120). ................................................................................................................................ 134<br />

Figure 119: Macrosection view of an unsupported, butt configuration weld made with a<br />

100º conical tool (0.025” diameter snub-nose and 0.015” cupped nose recess) at 800rpm,<br />

5.2 ipm, and a penetration depth of 0.11”. ...................................................................... 135<br />

Figure 120: Macrosection view of an unsupported, butt configuration weld made with a<br />

100º conical tool (0.025” diameter snub-nose and 0.015” cupped nose recess) at<br />

1000rpm, 10.4ipm, and a penetration depth of 0.11”. At this depth, unsupported welds<br />

made with the conical tool begin to split and protrude at the root for some of the tested<br />

weld parameters. The initiation of protrusion and splitting in the weld root at 0.110” was<br />

deemed undesirable by the authors for the suggested applications. The experimental<br />

matrix was therefore performed at 0.100” where this did not occur. It should be noted<br />

however that the strength of the unsupported welds increased with depth beyond the<br />

experimental matrix depth of 0.100”. ............................................................................. 135<br />

Figure 121: Surface appearance of an unsupported, butt configuration weld made with a<br />

100º conical tool (0.025” diameter snub-nose and 0.015” cupped nose recess) at<br />

1000rpm, 10.4ipm, and a penetration depth of 0.11” (1/16 th inch demarcations). ........ 136<br />

Figure 122: Conical tool, unsupported, partial penetration welds were performed at four<br />

depths at the 10.8ipm and 1000rpm parameter setting and showed a consistent increase in<br />

axial force with penetration depth. .................................................................................. 137<br />

Figure 123: Weld moment was a better indicator of penetration depth for the conical tool<br />

and a torque based control method was used in the experiment to maintain penetration<br />

depth. ............................................................................................................................... 138<br />

Figure 124: (threaded tool) Tetrahedral mesh created in the Fluent preprocessor Gambit.<br />

......................................................................................................................................... 139<br />

Figure 125: (threaded tool) Geometry ............................................................................ 140<br />

Figure 126: (threaded tool) Contours of temperature in degrees Celsius. ...................... 141<br />

Figure 127: (threaded tool) Contours of temperature in degrees Celsius. ...................... 142<br />

xv

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!